>>You clearly need to go back
>>and take high school physics
>>again because you just don't
>>get it. I tried
>>to find the most simple
>>proof so even your simple
>>mind could understand it.
>>Try reading it.
>>
http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3051
>>I think we've established who the
>>"liberal"
>
>I have had over 1 year
>of physics at a Major
>university. How much of you
>had?
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Fackler
>
>He was the first researcher to
>demonstrate that fragmentation was the
>most effective means of inflicting
>wounds in a modern military
>rifle round. He asserted that
>yawing and cavitation do not
>typically cause severe tissue trauma.
>Or, that the "permanent wound
>cavity" or actual damage caused
>by a projectile is the
>primary "stopping power" mechanism and
>that the "temporary wound cavity"
>or shock wave produced by
>the projectile is at best
>a secondary mechanism, if not
>irrelevant
>
>"A myth is an assertion which
>has either been disproven by
>careful experiment or for which
>there is no historical or
>scientific evidence in cases where
>it is reasonably expected. Belief
>in remote effects of penetrating
>projectiles may have originated with
>hunters and soldiers, but their
>reality is now well established
>in a broad body of
>scientific literature..."
>
>? Neurosurgery
>
>
>
>
http://blogs.howstuffworks.com/2009/05/12/how-does-a-bullet-carry-such-enormous-power/
>
>
>Lots of studies that say it
>is lots of studies that
>say it is not.
I have had as much physics(if not more) and I remember enough to know that Force is not the reason for the killing effects of bullets. It is the K.E. that is imparted on the animal and is the reason that velocity of the projectile is so important in terms of its effectiveness. Theories regarding the supposed ineffectiveness of hydrostatic shock have been disproven many times.
A bullet that travels nearly the entire width of the body cavity, through the vitals or close to them, and imparts all of its energy into creating collateral damage to the surrounding structures in proximity without wasting its energy into the hillside beyond the animal is more effective than one which travels a very confined course leaving only a small wound channel and causing very little damage to the surrounding structures. End of story. I'm done.