>Hey flopgun, this is what is
>amazing to me. Whether
>or not the narrative presented
>in the OP is true
>you have decided to believe,
>take sides, and give a
>pass to a man that
>didn't lift a finger or
>say a single word to
>stop a serious crime from
>happening, according to the story.
> AND according to that
>same story he didn't post
>this because of conscience or
>because he believes in conservation
>and rule of law, but
>because he hates someone.
>That's who you put your
>trust in and support Flopgun.
>
>
>I think the camera man is
>exactly like most men posting
>on this thread. A
>nutless voyer driven by hate.
> It just so happens
>that his hate parallels the
>law this time. I
>hope you get to meat
>your hero one day.
Funny how you can come up with so much BS yourself cutting people down in your posts like you do me and my honorable career that you mock all the time! Dude, nowhere on this thread have I made a single comment or statement that I justified how this came about or that the camera man is a saint, LOL! He should be held just as accountable for being an accessory to the act, but I doubt that will happen since there is nothing on the books that makes it illegal not to have come forward immediately since he didn't commit the actual violation. You just keep on keeping on with your BS because you're now thought of as the clown troll of this website and we wouldn't want to see you relinquish that title any time soon, LOL!