smokingfire
Active Member
- Messages
- 142
Curious to see what's most popular on here.
I have the EL and trying hard to convince myself I don’t need the NL pures. Lol. I think I am losing the battle.Swarovski NL 12x42 is my go to now days. Used to run the EL 10x42 before upgrading back in 2020
Sell the ELs get the NLs and never look backI have the EL and trying hard to convince myself I don’t need the NL pures. Lol. I think I am losing the battle.
Just stop already. Lol12x42 NL Pure is the best bino on the market today. I wish I had them.
You guys are killing me. Will get the pures this weekend.Best set up money can buy in my opinion. NL 12s and a ATX 95
View attachment 121648
Best 3 grand you’ll ever spend when it comes to huntingYou guys are killing me. Will get the pures this weekend.
Buy two pair. I’ll try out the second pair for a few years for ya and see if they’re as good as I’m saying.You guys are killing me. Will get the pures this weekend.
Of course, but you are comparing apples to onions. Leica is far superior to swarovski and the poll is asking for opinions for an inferior set of binocularsMy late 1990s era Leica 10x42 BA are by far the best bino I have or ever used. My Swaros are nice, but not even close IMO.
Of course, but you are comparing apples to onions. Leica is far superior to swarovski and the poll is asking for opinions for an inferior set of binoculars
It was, I am a little slow....I thought it was about magnification preference.
My bad.
What do you feel like Leica does better than Swarovski?My late 1990s era Leica 10x42 BA are by far the best bino I have or ever used. My Swaros are nice, but not even close IMO.
the 115mm objective for the ATX is even better, especially if you combine it with the BTXBest set up money can buy in my opinion. NL 12s and a ATX 95
View attachment 121648
I debated switching to the 115 but it takes up a lot of room in the pack versus the 95the 115mm objective for the ATX is even better, especially if you combine it with the BTX
Even the 95 isn't great in a pack. Currently my 115 is mostly for shorter hikes and the truck. It really doesn't add to much weight in the pack and I'm almost always hiking with a pack large enough to put 100lbs of meat, so the small amount of extra space isn't a problem.I debated switching to the 115 but it takes up a lot of room in the pack versus the 95
Makes me drool, FIL has the 95 btx told my BIL and wife I got dibs on that. Once I get back being able to spend way more time on the mountain I will justify the NL’s looked through a buddies and immediately wanted to throw my UHD’s off a cliffBest set up money can buy in my opinion. NL 12s and a ATX 95
View attachment 121648
What a cracker?Swarovski has the best warranty in the business.....and you'll need it.
You must have drawn the black bean somewhere. Never had a lick of trouble with mineSwarovski has the best warranty in the business.....and you'll need it.
In seven states that's a hate crimeWhat a cracker?
Ya no ****???In seven states that's a hate crime
I'm like you, old school, but with 10x42 Zeiss Classics.My late 1990s era Leica 10x42 BA are by far the best bino I have or ever used. My Swaros are nice, but not even close IMO.
I’m waiting until I make Bessy money until I buy my NLs.
You're Like Everybody-else!
Gotta Get Your NL's &Then Upgrade To The ZL's When They Show Up, Right?
HINT: With PISSCUTTERS Getting Smaller & Smaller You'll Always Need The Best Glass To Make Them Look Better/Bigger!