And yet another in a long line of intellectual white flags of surrender from RELH.
Key words, Sheriff + Lose Federal Funding
I know that you being a career Socialist the mere thought of losing federal funding at any level gets your panties waded up.
As usual, you have nothing. Would you like to me post the same information from multiple conservative sites? Just let me know my socialist friend and I will happily post them for you.
"California sheriffs say 'sanctuary state' bill would prevent immigration officials from going after violent offenders"
The statement above is outdated and untrue.
"Federal law requires that electronic fingerprint records for all offenders booked into state prisons and local jails be sent to the FBI and to the Department of Homeland Security. ICE receives an electronic notification when DHS has previously entered an inmate?s information into its databases and determines whether the person is a priority for deportation. If so, it can request the arresting agency to hold or notify ICE before the person is let go.
Under Senate Bill 54, communication between ICE and state and local law enforcement agencies would be limited to passing on information about inmates who have previously been deported for a violent felony, or are serving time on a misdemeanor or felony and have a prior serious or violent felony conviction. State and local agencies would only be able respond to requests from ICE for other information if it is already available to the public."
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-sanctuary-state-bill-explained-20170413-htmlstory.html
Why do you hate Law Enforcement Officers so much RELH? What does the Kevin De Leon have to do with the official response by the national Law Enforcement Immigration Task Force? Are you telling all of us that all those retired Police Chiefs from across the nation are liberals?
Are sanctuary cities safer than non-sanctuary cities?
Stop deflecting, grow a pair and answer the simple questions.