cheeseheadinOHIO
Active Member
- Messages
- 490
Getting closer...
Stone goes down like a porn star.
- Thread starter cheeseheadinOHIO
- Start date
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
>Another Trump friend going down. I'll
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
For God sakes BFD , you all thought Cohen was gonna take Trump down , you guys are Morons .
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
For God sakes BFD , you all thought Cohen was gonna take Trump down , you guys are Morons .
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 09:00AM (MST)[p]Sarah Huckabee Colonel Sanders is already out there saying this has nothing to do with Trump. Stone lied to protect Trump but that has nothing to do with Trump ? O'tay.
This makes goon # 34 for Mueller with the best yet to come. he's get'in him a few witch's isn't he ? the Daniel Boone of witch hunters.
Glen says Stone won't talk. maybe not before a few nights with Tyrone. well, unless he likes it. but the point is what is it exactly Glenn thinks he knows that he won't say ? there is all you need to know about a Trump chump. Glen doesn't care if Putie has Trump bent over a stump as long as we can't prove it. that goes for the entire 1/3 of this country who love this POS.
Another thing comrades, nothing you can do about Mueller will save you now. the house has the power to do everything Mueller can and much much more. you better pray to the orange jebus Mueller is all you have to fear. in short, you're phuked.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
This makes goon # 34 for Mueller with the best yet to come. he's get'in him a few witch's isn't he ? the Daniel Boone of witch hunters.
Glen says Stone won't talk. maybe not before a few nights with Tyrone. well, unless he likes it. but the point is what is it exactly Glenn thinks he knows that he won't say ? there is all you need to know about a Trump chump. Glen doesn't care if Putie has Trump bent over a stump as long as we can't prove it. that goes for the entire 1/3 of this country who love this POS.
Another thing comrades, nothing you can do about Mueller will save you now. the house has the power to do everything Mueller can and much much more. you better pray to the orange jebus Mueller is all you have to fear. in short, you're phuked.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
>LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19
>AT 09:00?AM (MST)
>
>Sarah Huckabee Colonel Sanders is already
>out there saying this has
>nothing to do with Trump.
> Stone lied to protect
>Trump but that has nothing
>to do with Trump ?
> O'tay.
>
>This makes goon # 34 for
>Mueller with the best yet
>to come. he's get'in
>him a few witch's isn't
>he ? the
>Daniel Boone of witch hunters.
>
>
>
>Glen says Stone won't talk. maybe
>not before a few nights
>with Tyrone. well, unless
>he likes it.
>but the point is what
>is it exactly Glenn thinks
>he knows that he won't
>say ? there is
>all you need to know
>about a Trump chump.
> Glen doesn't care if
>Putie has Trump bent over
>a stump as long as
>we can't prove it.
>that goes for the entire
>1/3 of this country who
>love this POS.
>
>
>Another thing comrades, nothing you
>can do about Mueller will
>save you now. the
>house has the power to
>do everything Mueller can and
>much much more. you
>better pray to the orange
>jebus Mueller is all
>you have to fear.
> in short, you're phuked.
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
Why didn't they shoot Stone they had an army of Armed FBI there , it's a joke with what they are charging him with pretty soon they will charging people with conspiracy to breathe. Comey and the gang are still at it , ocho still believes that Hillary is President, have another swig Ocho.
>AT 09:00?AM (MST)
>
>Sarah Huckabee Colonel Sanders is already
>out there saying this has
>nothing to do with Trump.
> Stone lied to protect
>Trump but that has nothing
>to do with Trump ?
> O'tay.
>
>This makes goon # 34 for
>Mueller with the best yet
>to come. he's get'in
>him a few witch's isn't
>he ? the
>Daniel Boone of witch hunters.
>
>
>
>Glen says Stone won't talk. maybe
>not before a few nights
>with Tyrone. well, unless
>he likes it.
>but the point is what
>is it exactly Glenn thinks
>he knows that he won't
>say ? there is
>all you need to know
>about a Trump chump.
> Glen doesn't care if
>Putie has Trump bent over
>a stump as long as
>we can't prove it.
>that goes for the entire
>1/3 of this country who
>love this POS.
>
>
>Another thing comrades, nothing you
>can do about Mueller will
>save you now. the
>house has the power to
>do everything Mueller can and
>much much more. you
>better pray to the orange
>jebus Mueller is all
>you have to fear.
> in short, you're phuked.
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
Why didn't they shoot Stone they had an army of Armed FBI there , it's a joke with what they are charging him with pretty soon they will charging people with conspiracy to breathe. Comey and the gang are still at it , ocho still believes that Hillary is President, have another swig Ocho.
cheeseheadinOHIO
Active Member
- Messages
- 490
>The cheesedick "this is the one"
>drive by! TFF
>
>
>
>
>#livelikezac
That all you got DW is name calling? Get a life and grow up.
>drive by! TFF
>
>
>
>
>#livelikezac
That all you got DW is name calling? Get a life and grow up.
cannonball
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,267
>Another Trump friend going down. I'll
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Founder, You are a brave person to make that statement. Pres. Trump supporters are the majority of your audience here and regardless of what happens they think that's politics and the Dem's just get a pass for doing worse. Regardless of his mouth, I still like most of his politics. Most politicians in both party's are spineless and only worried about themselves. Soon we will have the Democrats in charge and a Democrat president then watch your freedoms diminish. Your and my Browning Automatic will be cut up in little pieces and you will say President Trump wasn't such a bad president.
He certainly could have broken some laws, but unless you have paid Utah sales tax on every thing you purchased over the internet you need to join the chair next to him.
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Founder, You are a brave person to make that statement. Pres. Trump supporters are the majority of your audience here and regardless of what happens they think that's politics and the Dem's just get a pass for doing worse. Regardless of his mouth, I still like most of his politics. Most politicians in both party's are spineless and only worried about themselves. Soon we will have the Democrats in charge and a Democrat president then watch your freedoms diminish. Your and my Browning Automatic will be cut up in little pieces and you will say President Trump wasn't such a bad president.
He certainly could have broken some laws, but unless you have paid Utah sales tax on every thing you purchased over the internet you need to join the chair next to him.
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 10:09AM (MST)[p]!
>
>Founder, You are a brave
>person to make that statement.
> Pres. Trump supporters are
>the majority of your audience
>here and regardless of what
>happens they think that's politics
>and the Dem's just get
>a pass for doing worse.
> Regardless of his mouth,
>I still like most of
>his politics. Most politicians
>in both party's are spineless
>and only worried about themselves.
So if the Dems get a "pass" who gives them the "pass". It is all Trump nominees who hold the levers of power to investigate any crimes the Dems have been accused of committing.
> Soon we will have
>the Democrats in charge and
>a Democrat president then watch
>your freedoms diminish. Your
>and my Browning Automatic will
>be cut up in little
>pieces and you will say
>President Trump wasn't such a
>bad president.
You know that I never lost a single gun in 8 years of Obama and that was the rallying cry from day one, that he was going to come after my guns. Yet ask the guys who love their bumpstocks which president through an EO made them illegal? The slippery slope argument went out the window with that one. Obama sucked on nearly every policy front yet guns are one thing he never touched.
>
>He certainly could have broken some
>laws, but unless you have
>paid Utah sales tax on
>every thing you purchased over
>the internet you need to
>join the chair next to
>him.
So what laws did he break and how do you know they are the same as not paying sales tax? So you are saying you are perfectly okay with a criminal in the White House? Would you say that if he were from the other party?
History is going to prove that the Trump presidency was a watershed moment for the nation and will mark a dark period of direction of our Republic.
Nemont
>
>Founder, You are a brave
>person to make that statement.
> Pres. Trump supporters are
>the majority of your audience
>here and regardless of what
>happens they think that's politics
>and the Dem's just get
>a pass for doing worse.
> Regardless of his mouth,
>I still like most of
>his politics. Most politicians
>in both party's are spineless
>and only worried about themselves.
So if the Dems get a "pass" who gives them the "pass". It is all Trump nominees who hold the levers of power to investigate any crimes the Dems have been accused of committing.
> Soon we will have
>the Democrats in charge and
>a Democrat president then watch
>your freedoms diminish. Your
>and my Browning Automatic will
>be cut up in little
>pieces and you will say
>President Trump wasn't such a
>bad president.
You know that I never lost a single gun in 8 years of Obama and that was the rallying cry from day one, that he was going to come after my guns. Yet ask the guys who love their bumpstocks which president through an EO made them illegal? The slippery slope argument went out the window with that one. Obama sucked on nearly every policy front yet guns are one thing he never touched.
>
>He certainly could have broken some
>laws, but unless you have
>paid Utah sales tax on
>every thing you purchased over
>the internet you need to
>join the chair next to
>him.
So what laws did he break and how do you know they are the same as not paying sales tax? So you are saying you are perfectly okay with a criminal in the White House? Would you say that if he were from the other party?
History is going to prove that the Trump presidency was a watershed moment for the nation and will mark a dark period of direction of our Republic.
Nemont
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 10:18AM (MST)[p]>
>I'm not sure if you chumps
>will ever understand why you're
>the minority, but I
>hope so.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
How?s your boy Cohen and Stormy doing ? Sometimes it's better not to open your trap isn't it .
>I'm not sure if you chumps
>will ever understand why you're
>the minority, but I
>hope so.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
How?s your boy Cohen and Stormy doing ? Sometimes it's better not to open your trap isn't it .
Hawkeye
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,012
Well, a quick read of the threads on the political forum shows that some things never change. As usual, the posts are full of name calling, there is very little fruitful discussion, and both sides are deeply entrenched. Not too different from the current situation in Washington DC.
As somebody who voted for Trump, likes most of his policies, but dislikes many of his tweets and statements, I will say that I am concerned by the number of people close to Trump that seem to have been involved in illegal or corrupt activities (even thought most of those activities are unrelated to the campaign). That being said, I am equally concerned by the disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and his buddies have received compared to Hillary Clinton and folks on the left. And I believe that we would uncover plently of dirt if Hillary received the same level of scrutiny that Trump has received.
When I hear Founder and others saying that Trump is terrible and he has got to go, my question is who will replace him? Would Hillary Clinton have been a better option? I suppose the answer to that question depends on your political views but I will take Trump and the headaches that go along with his tweeting and his prior affairs any day over what we would have gotten if Hillary were elected. Trump is not perfect and I will not try to defend everything he says or does but I voted for him and I will likely vote for again unless there is a better candidate that has a realistic chance of winning. To Founder and others who hate Trump, would you prefer Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or Michael Avenatti? I have many friends who are Democrats and many of them are concerned with the direction the Democratic party is heading. It seems like a race to see who can move further to the left toward socialism, medicare for all, "free" college, open borders, etc. That does not seem like a roadmap for success and propserity. Our current political system is a mess but we have to vote for someone.
Ok, now light me up!
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
As somebody who voted for Trump, likes most of his policies, but dislikes many of his tweets and statements, I will say that I am concerned by the number of people close to Trump that seem to have been involved in illegal or corrupt activities (even thought most of those activities are unrelated to the campaign). That being said, I am equally concerned by the disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and his buddies have received compared to Hillary Clinton and folks on the left. And I believe that we would uncover plently of dirt if Hillary received the same level of scrutiny that Trump has received.
When I hear Founder and others saying that Trump is terrible and he has got to go, my question is who will replace him? Would Hillary Clinton have been a better option? I suppose the answer to that question depends on your political views but I will take Trump and the headaches that go along with his tweeting and his prior affairs any day over what we would have gotten if Hillary were elected. Trump is not perfect and I will not try to defend everything he says or does but I voted for him and I will likely vote for again unless there is a better candidate that has a realistic chance of winning. To Founder and others who hate Trump, would you prefer Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or Michael Avenatti? I have many friends who are Democrats and many of them are concerned with the direction the Democratic party is heading. It seems like a race to see who can move further to the left toward socialism, medicare for all, "free" college, open borders, etc. That does not seem like a roadmap for success and propserity. Our current political system is a mess but we have to vote for someone.
Ok, now light me up!
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 11:02AM (MST)[p]>Well, a quick read of the
>threads on the political forum
>shows that some things never
>change. As usual, the
>posts are full of name
>calling, there is very little
>fruitful discussion, and both sides
>are deeply entrenched. Not
>too different from the current
>situation in Washington DC.
>
I have made a vow to stop name calling and simply use a term like Trump supporters. Trump is terrible in almost everything he does. Have you noticed that anyone who flies close to the Trump orbit ends up diminished for having come near him? That says a lot about the guy.
>As somebody who voted for Trump,
>likes most of his policies,
>but dislikes many of his
>tweets and statements, I will
>say that I am concerned
>by the number of people
>close to Trump that seem
>to have been involved in
>illegal or corrupt activities (even
>thought most of those activities
>are unrelated to the campaign).
Have you looked at the Stone Indictment? If proven true it has everything to do with the Trump Campaign
Read it:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone
> That being said, I
>am equally concerned by the
>disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and
>his buddies have received compared
>to Hillary Clinton and folks
>on the left. And
>I believe that we would
>uncover plently of dirt if
>Hillary received the same level
>of scrutiny that Trump has
>received.
Who has appointed the immediate past and the future Attorney General? Why didn't the House Oversight Committee investigate all things Hillary when Republicans had the gavel for the last couple of years? You can whine and complain about Hillary dirt but if the Trump's appointees and Republicans with power to subpoena records don't go after her what does that say?
>When I hear Founder and
>others saying that Trump is
>terrible and he has got
>to go, my question is
>who will replace him?
>Would Hillary Clinton have been
>a better option? I
>suppose the answer to that
>question depends on your political
>views but I will take
>Trump and the headaches that
>go along with his tweeting
>and his prior affairs any
>day over what we would
>have gotten if Hillary were
>elected. Trump is not
>perfect and I will not
>try to defend everything he
>says or does but I
>voted for him and I
>will likely vote for again
>unless there is a better
>candidate that has a realistic
>chance of winning.
> To
>Founder and others who hate
>Trump, would you prefer Bernie
>Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren,
>Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or
>Michael Avenatti?
That is a BS argument, Trump is a flawed leader who is doing permanent and lasting harm to both the conservative movement and the Republican brand. Disliking Trump is not equal to loving and wanting Democrats that is complete and total BS.
> I have
>many friends who are Democrats
>and many of them are
>concerned with the direction the
>Democratic party is heading.
>It seems like a race
>to see who can move
>further to the left toward
>socialism, medicare for all, "free"
>college, open borders, etc.
>That does not seem like
>a roadmap for success and
>propserity. Our current political
>system is a mess but
>we have to vote for
>someone.
Everyone should be concerned with whack job liberals moving further left. What is curious is that you say you will continue to vote for the one person whose own antics makes people turn away in disgust and as you say then they say, "well I have to vote for someone, I guess a socialist who acts like an adult isn't as bad as a guy who acts like a two year old". That is what is going to happen.
>
>Ok, now light me up!
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
>threads on the political forum
>shows that some things never
>change. As usual, the
>posts are full of name
>calling, there is very little
>fruitful discussion, and both sides
>are deeply entrenched. Not
>too different from the current
>situation in Washington DC.
>
I have made a vow to stop name calling and simply use a term like Trump supporters. Trump is terrible in almost everything he does. Have you noticed that anyone who flies close to the Trump orbit ends up diminished for having come near him? That says a lot about the guy.
>As somebody who voted for Trump,
>likes most of his policies,
>but dislikes many of his
>tweets and statements, I will
>say that I am concerned
>by the number of people
>close to Trump that seem
>to have been involved in
>illegal or corrupt activities (even
>thought most of those activities
>are unrelated to the campaign).
Have you looked at the Stone Indictment? If proven true it has everything to do with the Trump Campaign
Read it:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone
> That being said, I
>am equally concerned by the
>disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and
>his buddies have received compared
>to Hillary Clinton and folks
>on the left. And
>I believe that we would
>uncover plently of dirt if
>Hillary received the same level
>of scrutiny that Trump has
>received.
Who has appointed the immediate past and the future Attorney General? Why didn't the House Oversight Committee investigate all things Hillary when Republicans had the gavel for the last couple of years? You can whine and complain about Hillary dirt but if the Trump's appointees and Republicans with power to subpoena records don't go after her what does that say?
>When I hear Founder and
>others saying that Trump is
>terrible and he has got
>to go, my question is
>who will replace him?
>Would Hillary Clinton have been
>a better option? I
>suppose the answer to that
>question depends on your political
>views but I will take
>Trump and the headaches that
>go along with his tweeting
>and his prior affairs any
>day over what we would
>have gotten if Hillary were
>elected. Trump is not
>perfect and I will not
>try to defend everything he
>says or does but I
>voted for him and I
>will likely vote for again
>unless there is a better
>candidate that has a realistic
>chance of winning.
> To
>Founder and others who hate
>Trump, would you prefer Bernie
>Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren,
>Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or
>Michael Avenatti?
That is a BS argument, Trump is a flawed leader who is doing permanent and lasting harm to both the conservative movement and the Republican brand. Disliking Trump is not equal to loving and wanting Democrats that is complete and total BS.
> I have
>many friends who are Democrats
>and many of them are
>concerned with the direction the
>Democratic party is heading.
>It seems like a race
>to see who can move
>further to the left toward
>socialism, medicare for all, "free"
>college, open borders, etc.
>That does not seem like
>a roadmap for success and
>propserity. Our current political
>system is a mess but
>we have to vote for
>someone.
Everyone should be concerned with whack job liberals moving further left. What is curious is that you say you will continue to vote for the one person whose own antics makes people turn away in disgust and as you say then they say, "well I have to vote for someone, I guess a socialist who acts like an adult isn't as bad as a guy who acts like a two year old". That is what is going to happen.
>
>Ok, now light me up!
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
cheeseheadinOHIO
Active Member
- Messages
- 490
>>>The cheesedick "this is the one"
>>>drive by! TFF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>#livelikezac
>>
>>
>>That all you got DW is
>>name calling? Get a
>>life and grow up.
>
>
> Thanks
>for the Bomb shell info
>cheesedick , your a special
>kind of stupid ?
Yeah, you're a genius. I threw a couple words out there and that's it needs to drive you tRUMP supporters batchit crazy. I'm having fun. Your original name calling ideas are fantastic. Who cares, I really don't. You're weak. Lol
>>>drive by! TFF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>#livelikezac
>>
>>
>>That all you got DW is
>>name calling? Get a
>>life and grow up.
>
>
> Thanks
>for the Bomb shell info
>cheesedick , your a special
>kind of stupid ?
Yeah, you're a genius. I threw a couple words out there and that's it needs to drive you tRUMP supporters batchit crazy. I'm having fun. Your original name calling ideas are fantastic. Who cares, I really don't. You're weak. Lol
The very reason that we are getting candidates further to the extremes is evident in your post. The entire notion that if someone dislikes Trump must mean they love Hillary (or whoever else) is absurd. Those who blindly support Trump (or anyone for that matter) are the only voice heard from the right. Anyone who doesn't offer that blind support is labeled as a RINO or a liberal. The left is similar, though they don't currently have a single person to blindly support. I will say my democrat friends seem to be far more likely to call out those on their side for their bullshit, than my republican friends are to call out Trump, or even McConnell (who is a shitbag by any measure) on anything. Small sample, and most Wyoming democrats tend to be very moderate, just my observations.
As far as scrutiny on Hillary, it seems to me like she was investigated for a long damn time, yet doesn't have a big long list of people from her circle under indictment. I'm sure I'm labeled as a Hillary loving liberal hippy- but the truth is, of the candidates we were stuck with in the 2016 general election were pretty much the bottom of the barrel on both sides.
If the reasonable just sit quietly and accept the bad policy brought by the extremes of both parties, we are well on our way to the end. Right now, the only voices heard are those on the extremes, so those are the candidates we'll see.
>As somebody who voted for Trump,
>likes most of his policies,
>but dislikes many of his
>tweets and statements, I will
>say that I am concerned
>by the number of people
>close to Trump that seem
>to have been involved in
>illegal or corrupt activities (even
>thought most of those activities
>are unrelated to the campaign).
> That being said, I
>am equally concerned by the
>disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and
>his buddies have received compared
>to Hillary Clinton and folks
>on the left. And
>I believe that we would
>uncover plently of dirt if
>Hillary received the same level
>of scrutiny that Trump has
>received.
>
>When I hear Founder and
>others saying that Trump is
>terrible and he has got
>to go, my question is
>who will replace him?
>Would Hillary Clinton have been
>a better option? I
>suppose the answer to that
>question depends on your political
>views but I will take
>Trump and the headaches that
>go along with his tweeting
>and his prior affairs any
>day over what we would
>have gotten if Hillary were
>elected. Trump is not
>perfect and I will not
>try to defend everything he
>says or does but I
>voted for him and I
>will likely vote for again
>unless there is a better
>candidate that has a realistic
>chance of winning. To
>Founder and others who hate
>Trump, would you prefer Bernie
>Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren,
>Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or
>Michael Avenatti? I have
>many friends who are Democrats
>and many of them are
>concerned with the direction the
>Democratic party is heading.
>It seems like a race
>to see who can move
>further to the left toward
>socialism, medicare for all, "free"
>college, open borders, etc.
>That does not seem like
>a roadmap for success and
>propserity. Our current political
>system is a mess but
>we have to vote for
>someone.
>
>Ok, now light me up!
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
As far as scrutiny on Hillary, it seems to me like she was investigated for a long damn time, yet doesn't have a big long list of people from her circle under indictment. I'm sure I'm labeled as a Hillary loving liberal hippy- but the truth is, of the candidates we were stuck with in the 2016 general election were pretty much the bottom of the barrel on both sides.
If the reasonable just sit quietly and accept the bad policy brought by the extremes of both parties, we are well on our way to the end. Right now, the only voices heard are those on the extremes, so those are the candidates we'll see.
>As somebody who voted for Trump,
>likes most of his policies,
>but dislikes many of his
>tweets and statements, I will
>say that I am concerned
>by the number of people
>close to Trump that seem
>to have been involved in
>illegal or corrupt activities (even
>thought most of those activities
>are unrelated to the campaign).
> That being said, I
>am equally concerned by the
>disparate treatment/scrutiny that Trump and
>his buddies have received compared
>to Hillary Clinton and folks
>on the left. And
>I believe that we would
>uncover plently of dirt if
>Hillary received the same level
>of scrutiny that Trump has
>received.
>
>When I hear Founder and
>others saying that Trump is
>terrible and he has got
>to go, my question is
>who will replace him?
>Would Hillary Clinton have been
>a better option? I
>suppose the answer to that
>question depends on your political
>views but I will take
>Trump and the headaches that
>go along with his tweeting
>and his prior affairs any
>day over what we would
>have gotten if Hillary were
>elected. Trump is not
>perfect and I will not
>try to defend everything he
>says or does but I
>voted for him and I
>will likely vote for again
>unless there is a better
>candidate that has a realistic
>chance of winning. To
>Founder and others who hate
>Trump, would you prefer Bernie
>Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren,
>Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke or
>Michael Avenatti? I have
>many friends who are Democrats
>and many of them are
>concerned with the direction the
>Democratic party is heading.
>It seems like a race
>to see who can move
>further to the left toward
>socialism, medicare for all, "free"
>college, open borders, etc.
>That does not seem like
>a roadmap for success and
>propserity. Our current political
>system is a mess but
>we have to vote for
>someone.
>
>Ok, now light me up!
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
>>>>The cheesedick "this is the one"
>>>>drive by! TFF
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>#livelikezac
>>>
>>>
>>>That all you got DW is
>>>name calling? Get a
>>>life and grow up.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>for the Bomb shell info
>>cheesedick , your a special
>>kind of stupid ?
>
>Yeah, you're a genius. I
>threw a couple words out
>there and that's it needs
>to drive you tRUMP supporters
>batchit crazy. I'm having
>fun. Your original name
>calling ideas are fantastic.
>Who cares, I really don't.
> You're weak. Lol
>
Drivein me crazy? TFF
#livelikezac
>>>>drive by! TFF
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>#livelikezac
>>>
>>>
>>>That all you got DW is
>>>name calling? Get a
>>>life and grow up.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>for the Bomb shell info
>>cheesedick , your a special
>>kind of stupid ?
>
>Yeah, you're a genius. I
>threw a couple words out
>there and that's it needs
>to drive you tRUMP supporters
>batchit crazy. I'm having
>fun. Your original name
>calling ideas are fantastic.
>Who cares, I really don't.
> You're weak. Lol
>
Drivein me crazy? TFF
#livelikezac
cannonball
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,267
Nemont, You might be right as far as the dark period, but lets take some analogies. Some of Utah's Olympic committee got caught bribing for the 2002 Olympics. When I was in Atlanta to some meetings the instructor ask everyone to introduce them self and where they are from. That instructor said, Oh! You're from Utah the place where they bribed the Olympic Committee. I told the packed meeting room that I was from the state where some people uncovered what was going on in Atlanta and other cities to get the Olympics in the past, and allowed it. It had been uncovered that Atlanta was one of the worst.
As I referred before to Utah's Use Tax, so if you are not paying sales tax on internet purchases you are breaking the law and could be indited
As the old adages go: You can't be partially pregnant. To those who don't pay a Utah use tax, we have established you are a prostitute, just at what cost. The thing you are saying is that Trump is guilty by association. By finding him guilty before any trial you and Founder are certainly part of the problem.
p.s. If you remember right when Obama was in office it would have been congress who would have stopped any gun control and he knew it, so give me a break. If you can't see if the Democrats had full control on congress and the Presidency gun control would be on top of their agenda you guys have your head in the sand!!
As I referred before to Utah's Use Tax, so if you are not paying sales tax on internet purchases you are breaking the law and could be indited
As the old adages go: You can't be partially pregnant. To those who don't pay a Utah use tax, we have established you are a prostitute, just at what cost. The thing you are saying is that Trump is guilty by association. By finding him guilty before any trial you and Founder are certainly part of the problem.
p.s. If you remember right when Obama was in office it would have been congress who would have stopped any gun control and he knew it, so give me a break. If you can't see if the Democrats had full control on congress and the Presidency gun control would be on top of their agenda you guys have your head in the sand!!
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 11:55AM (MST)[p]No, of course a far left candidate in Wyoming is not going to win (nor will a centrist candidate with a D by their name). When I referred to democrats I know, I wasn't talking about elected officials. I'm not opposed to the idea of a state income tax that is well implemented. I was always against the idea when I lived in other parts of the state, but all my billionaire neighbors using Western Wyoming as a tax shelter aren't really contributing to the state in any meaningful way. Just like our state's economy in general, our state funding is tied like a noose to the volatile oil and gas market, and the dead horse coal market. Wyoming has become the place for the uber rich to hide from taxes and run for office. Despite what they spout, they in no way have the interest of the average Wyoming citizen's interest anywhere on their radar. It is great fun to listen to them spew support for a wall while employing immigrant labor to cut the grass and clean the house.
>
>>Small sample, and most Wyoming
>>democrats tend to be very
>>moderate, just my observations.
>>
>>
>
>Do you think a far left
>candidate would win office in
>Wyoming? I do see you
>have some dumbass democrat in
>Laramie proposing a state income
>tax.
>
>
>#livelikezac
>
>>Small sample, and most Wyoming
>>democrats tend to be very
>>moderate, just my observations.
>>
>>
>
>Do you think a far left
>candidate would win office in
>Wyoming? I do see you
>have some dumbass democrat in
>Laramie proposing a state income
>tax.
>
>
>#livelikezac
heywouldya
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,578
As far as scrutiny on Hillary, it seems to me like she was investigated for a long damn time, yet doesn't have a big long list of people from her circle under indictment. I'm sure I'm labeled as a Hillary loving liberal hippy- but the truth is, of the candidates we were stuck with in the 2016 general election were pretty much the bottom of the barrel on both sides
It's pretty difficult to have a long list of people in her circle under indictment, when they all suspiciously die.
hwy
It's pretty difficult to have a long list of people in her circle under indictment, when they all suspiciously die.
hwy
Hawkeye
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,012
Two points:
First, I would not say that Hillary was investigated for a "long damn time." In fact, Comey wrote the exhoneration memo before she was even interviewed and the investigation was compeleted.
Second, I never said that anyone who dislikes Trump must love Hillary, Bernie, AOC, Beto, etc. Likewise, my dislike for Hillary does not mean that I love Trump. I simply noted that you have to vote for somebody. I voted for Trump because I felt like he was a better option that Hillary -- and I stand by that decision today. It will be interesting to see who the D and R candidates are in 2020. I am betting that Trump will be the R nominee. For those of you who hate Trump, would you vote for Beto or Bernie if they are the D nominee? Or would you consider writing in Founder? Founder would have my vote if he was on the ticket. ;-)
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
First, I would not say that Hillary was investigated for a "long damn time." In fact, Comey wrote the exhoneration memo before she was even interviewed and the investigation was compeleted.
Second, I never said that anyone who dislikes Trump must love Hillary, Bernie, AOC, Beto, etc. Likewise, my dislike for Hillary does not mean that I love Trump. I simply noted that you have to vote for somebody. I voted for Trump because I felt like he was a better option that Hillary -- and I stand by that decision today. It will be interesting to see who the D and R candidates are in 2020. I am betting that Trump will be the R nominee. For those of you who hate Trump, would you vote for Beto or Bernie if they are the D nominee? Or would you consider writing in Founder? Founder would have my vote if he was on the ticket. ;-)
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
If the election were held today, I wouldn't vote for either Trump or any of the Democrats who said they are running. I didn't vote for him last time around either and I stand by that decision. He is a terrible leader and a horrible representation of what should be an guaranteed sell to people who aspire to the American dream. He is losing the messaging on what the Republican party stands for and stripping away the future of the conservative movement in America.
Demographics of this nation say we on the right side of the political spectrum grow our tent to include something other than old white males. If not we are going the way of the dinosaurs and I cannot think of a single worse messenger for the Republican brand then the current president. Yeah if you support him and he has you as his base you are in but he has broadened his support among any of the important demographics. In fact in the last poll over the shut down he got clobbered by the people who decide elections in this country, the independent vote.
Nemont
Demographics of this nation say we on the right side of the political spectrum grow our tent to include something other than old white males. If not we are going the way of the dinosaurs and I cannot think of a single worse messenger for the Republican brand then the current president. Yeah if you support him and he has you as his base you are in but he has broadened his support among any of the important demographics. In fact in the last poll over the shut down he got clobbered by the people who decide elections in this country, the independent vote.
Nemont
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
I don't know for sure who should be our president, but I know who shouldn't be. Sure, I probably see eye to eye with on many issues, but regardless, he's not what I think should be representing our country. There are quite likely millions of people in this country whom I consider a better person to be president who share his same views.
Trump is a bad person. Know way would I ever want stand behind him and support him just because there could be worse people for the job. No. There are better people for the job.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Trump is a bad person. Know way would I ever want stand behind him and support him just because there could be worse people for the job. No. There are better people for the job.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 01:47PM (MST)[p]cannonball - My opinions and views are not based on what viewers on this site think, they're based on what I think. And I don't think Trump should be our president. There are many, many, many, many better people for the job in this country. That's my opinion.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
>The guy second in line for
>president would be far more
>presidential than Trump and someone
>whom I could probably respect
>for being a ?good? person.
>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>president.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Pelosi and Schumer gave there speech on Trump , 2 losers that would fit your agenda.
>president would be far more
>presidential than Trump and someone
>whom I could probably respect
>for being a ?good? person.
>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>president.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Pelosi and Schumer gave there speech on Trump , 2 losers that would fit your agenda.
nfh
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 7,701
>The guy second in line for
>president would be far more
>presidential than Trump and someone
>whom I could probably respect
>for being a ?good? person.
>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>president.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
FOUNDER IS JUST A LIBERAL CAUSE HE WANTS YOUR WYOMING POINTS SO HE CAN GO DEER HUNTING EVERY YEAR. JUST WANTS A FREE HANDOUT
>president would be far more
>presidential than Trump and someone
>whom I could probably respect
>for being a ?good? person.
>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>president.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
FOUNDER IS JUST A LIBERAL CAUSE HE WANTS YOUR WYOMING POINTS SO HE CAN GO DEER HUNTING EVERY YEAR. JUST WANTS A FREE HANDOUT
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
Because I think Trump shouldn't be our President, I must be a liberal. Ow many republicans exist in this country? And you're telling me Trump is the best one out to be president? I sure disagree with that!!
Man, you guys act as though no other choices on the planet exist.
If you could eat anything on the planet, would you eat dog crap just cause it might taste better than monkey crap, or baby diarrhea, or some other nasty crap. Not me, I'd rather have a cheeseburger from Five Guys.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Man, you guys act as though no other choices on the planet exist.
If you could eat anything on the planet, would you eat dog crap just cause it might taste better than monkey crap, or baby diarrhea, or some other nasty crap. Not me, I'd rather have a cheeseburger from Five Guys.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
My exact point. Founder says Pence would be far more presidential, and worthy of respect. That is immediately turned into "Pelosi or Schumer would better fit you agenda". Seriously? Pence is much further right than Trump will ever be, yet saying he is more respectable turns one into a mad raving liberal. This is why we're *******.
>>The guy second in line for
>>president would be far more
>>presidential than Trump and someone
>>whom I could probably respect
>>for being a ?good? person.
>>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>>president.
>>
>>Brian Latturner
>>MonsterMuleys.com
>>@mm_founder on Instagram
>>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>>on Facebook!
>
>
> Pelosi and
>Schumer gave there speech
>on Trump , 2 losers
> that would fit your
>agenda.
>>The guy second in line for
>>president would be far more
>>presidential than Trump and someone
>>whom I could probably respect
>>for being a ?good? person.
>>Not Trump. He shouldn't be
>>president.
>>
>>Brian Latturner
>>MonsterMuleys.com
>>@mm_founder on Instagram
>>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>>on Facebook!
>
>
> Pelosi and
>Schumer gave there speech
>on Trump , 2 losers
> that would fit your
>agenda.
You have to understand the Trump chump little mindset. they know Trump is a horrible leader, they know he's a pathological liar, they know he has worse morals than Larry Flint, they know he's dumber than a sack of hammers.
What they love about him is HE HATES THE SAME PEOPLE THEY DO . wanting to decimate our government and sow chaos is just a bonus.
There is no reasoning with them they're incapable of any thoughts not serving their narcissistic agenda. consider their hate and disapproval a badge of honor. I sure as chit do.
This will be a very bad rotten no good year for the chumps as we've already seen. I cannot stress enough how much enjoyment I'll get from it all.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
What they love about him is HE HATES THE SAME PEOPLE THEY DO . wanting to decimate our government and sow chaos is just a bonus.
There is no reasoning with them they're incapable of any thoughts not serving their narcissistic agenda. consider their hate and disapproval a badge of honor. I sure as chit do.
This will be a very bad rotten no good year for the chumps as we've already seen. I cannot stress enough how much enjoyment I'll get from it all.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
Hawkeye
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,012
OK, now we are getting to the core issue. If the two nominees fom the two major parties in 2020 are Trump and Bernie, who will you vote for? Trump or Bernie? Or will you write in Mitt Romney, Beto or somebody else? I won't. I will vote for one of the two major party candidates who actually have a chance of winning the election and who most closely represents my values. Founder views this as choosing between baby crap and monkey crap. So be it. I may have to plug my nose to do so but I will likely going to vote for one of the two candidate who can actually win the election. Does that make me a Trump lover or a Bernie lover? No, it makes me a pragmatist.
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
DING DING DING! we have a winner. If Bernie and Trump are the 2020 nominees, then we've already lost, because we the people let it happen. Not being willing to call out your own side on their bullshit makes your side weak. They are doing what they are told do, and the public does the telling- just not the way we think we do.
>
>No it makes you an enabler
>of the status quo.
>If the two parties can
>count on half the country
>voting for whom ever they
>run they will continue to
>bow to the loudest and
>most extreme.
>
>Nemont
>
>No it makes you an enabler
>of the status quo.
>If the two parties can
>count on half the country
>voting for whom ever they
>run they will continue to
>bow to the loudest and
>most extreme.
>
>Nemont
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
One wonders why law and order Republicans have turned their back on law and order. What exactly was illegal about the raid on Roger Stone?
He was indicted by a grand jury and had a history of lying, hiding and concealing evidence. I know getting close to Trump bothers his supporters but you are implying something illegal took place.
Nemont
He was indicted by a grand jury and had a history of lying, hiding and concealing evidence. I know getting close to Trump bothers his supporters but you are implying something illegal took place.
Nemont
Maybe Giuliani tipped them off when he said maybe there is collusion. that leads right to Stone's doorstep. stake him out you know what's coming next.
If the election were held today Bernie would easily win. but neither he nor Trump will be on the ballot next fall so come up with a better hypothetical race.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
If the election were held today Bernie would easily win. but neither he nor Trump will be on the ballot next fall so come up with a better hypothetical race.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
What rights of Roger Stone were violated? Suppose Mueller has a reason to seek an indictment for Roger Stone? Seems like a grand jury agreed that bringing charges was the right thing to do.
You got to know the it days of rage inside the White House the close Mueller gets to the inner circle. I bet Bannon is having a field day ratting on his former co-workers.
What is going to happen if Mueller can make a case that Trump and his campaign worked with a foreign country in a conspiracy to get him elected? Just curious if you will still be a Trump supporter?
I suspect Trump's base don't care if there were Russians inside his campaign or whether he sold out to Putin because they look the other way on everything else he does. I can hear it now.
Nemont
You got to know the it days of rage inside the White House the close Mueller gets to the inner circle. I bet Bannon is having a field day ratting on his former co-workers.
What is going to happen if Mueller can make a case that Trump and his campaign worked with a foreign country in a conspiracy to get him elected? Just curious if you will still be a Trump supporter?
I suspect Trump's base don't care if there were Russians inside his campaign or whether he sold out to Putin because they look the other way on everything else he does. I can hear it now.
Nemont
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 03:58PM (MST)[p]Sure he had a reason. He could've rolled in with an unmarked and 2 agents and brought him in. They weren't takein down an ms-13 gang house. It was all a big show to make him look guilty before trial. Guess we have our Gestapo now.
#livelikezac
#livelikezac
Hawkeye
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,012
I am all for supporting and voting for the best candidate during the primaries. I, personally, did not support Donald Trump in the primary election but I voted for him in the general election. So for those of you that do not like the Democrat or Republican nominee, what are you going to do? Vote third-party? Stay home? Or write in somebody else?
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
-Hawkeye-
My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
"It is fair to ask how much comes in with the five dollar application fees and how much went onto the ground.? Don Peay of SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board Meeting.
"There will be a full accounting of how the applications fees are spent.? Don Peay of SFW - 9/26/2006 - Monstermuleys.com
Write is somebody else. as an American I have an obligation to vote. I don't have an obligation to vote for someone else's idea of great candidates.
Right now the field is WIDE OPEN for both parties. it would be foolish to attempt predicting who will be on the ballot. the dems are hoping Trump is on one of them but I doubt it.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
Right now the field is WIDE OPEN for both parties. it would be foolish to attempt predicting who will be on the ballot. the dems are hoping Trump is on one of them but I doubt it.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
>
>Write is somebody else. as
>an American I have an
>obligation to vote. I
>don't have an obligation to
>vote for someone else's idea
>of great candidates.
>
>
>Right now the field is WIDE
>OPEN for both parties.
>it would be foolish to
>attempt predicting who will be
>on the ballot. the
>dems are hoping Trump is
>on one of them but
>I doubt it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
SMFH
#livelikezac
>Write is somebody else. as
>an American I have an
>obligation to vote. I
>don't have an obligation to
>vote for someone else's idea
>of great candidates.
>
>
>Right now the field is WIDE
>OPEN for both parties.
>it would be foolish to
>attempt predicting who will be
>on the ballot. the
>dems are hoping Trump is
>on one of them but
>I doubt it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
SMFH
#livelikezac
RELH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 17,483
Dude right now the Republicans are hoping that Warren, Sanders, Biden, or Harris is on the Dem's list. I do not see the Dems liberal wing that rules the party allowing a moderate Dem to get past the primary to face a GOP candidate. It will be a left wing socialist or none at all.
RELH
RELH
LAST EDITED ON Jan-25-19 AT 04:49PM (MST)[p]Well the ultra libs just kicked your azz in the midterms so maybe you're onto something.
The main thing you need to worry about is that trump doesn't phuk the republicans so bad before he's drug off the stage that no republican can win but any lib could. and that's very possible.
This race will be extra interesting because normally the VP is the front runner if the president isn't on the party ballot. but that useless deadazz POS couldn't win as dog catcher for a 2 bit town. that's why it's so totally unpredictable where it goes.
Anyway, sorry to hear about your comrade Stone. he said he's rot in jail before he flipped on Trump. lets see some maggots that works for me.
Ha ha ha !
https://www.yahoo.com/news/roger-stone-draws-judge-threw-185301118.html
Stay Thirsty My Friends
The main thing you need to worry about is that trump doesn't phuk the republicans so bad before he's drug off the stage that no republican can win but any lib could. and that's very possible.
This race will be extra interesting because normally the VP is the front runner if the president isn't on the party ballot. but that useless deadazz POS couldn't win as dog catcher for a 2 bit town. that's why it's so totally unpredictable where it goes.
Anyway, sorry to hear about your comrade Stone. he said he's rot in jail before he flipped on Trump. lets see some maggots that works for me.
Ha ha ha !
https://www.yahoo.com/news/roger-stone-draws-judge-threw-185301118.html
Stay Thirsty My Friends
grizzly
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 5,604
>Right now the field is WIDE
>OPEN for both parties.
I wish that was true. Remember when Trump accused the Dems of "rigging" the election for Hillary?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehil...ive-trump-undivided-support-ahead-of-2020?amp
>OPEN for both parties.
I wish that was true. Remember when Trump accused the Dems of "rigging" the election for Hillary?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehil...ive-trump-undivided-support-ahead-of-2020?amp
Big surprise, of course they did. until they don't.
At this point his survival is their survival. a sinking ship is better than swimming until right before it goes down and then you get the hell away from it.
Get your life vests on.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
At this point his survival is their survival. a sinking ship is better than swimming until right before it goes down and then you get the hell away from it.
Get your life vests on.
Stay Thirsty My Friends
grizzly
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 5,604
"I will vote for one of the two major party candidates who actually have a chance of winning the election and who most closely represents my values." -Hawkeye
I've got to disagree with you here, buddy. You live in Utah so your vote will go to the Republican regardless. You might as well make a statement by writing in and lessening that margin of victory if the Republican Party puts forth a severely flawed candidate with whom you disagree. If they begin to see a public taste for reasonable and moral candidates, via slimming margins in their safety states, they'll be forced to reconsider in the future.
Blind support offers no incentive for improvement.
Grizzly
I've got to disagree with you here, buddy. You live in Utah so your vote will go to the Republican regardless. You might as well make a statement by writing in and lessening that margin of victory if the Republican Party puts forth a severely flawed candidate with whom you disagree. If they begin to see a public taste for reasonable and moral candidates, via slimming margins in their safety states, they'll be forced to reconsider in the future.
Blind support offers no incentive for improvement.
Grizzly
Founder
Founder Since 1999
- Messages
- 11,473
I hate to think Trump will again be an option. I can't believe there are people who actually believe he's so great that he should continue leading our country. I know there has to be better options out there than him and the republicans party needs to support the better option, not Trump.
>I am all for supporting and
>voting for the best candidate
>during the primaries. I,
>personally, did not support Donald
>Trump in the primary election
>but I voted for him
>in the general election.
>So for those of you
>that do not like the
>Democrat or Republican nominee, what
>are you going to do?
>Vote third-party? Stay home?
>Or write in somebody else?
>
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
>I am all for supporting and
>voting for the best candidate
>during the primaries. I,
>personally, did not support Donald
>Trump in the primary election
>but I voted for him
>in the general election.
>So for those of you
>that do not like the
>Democrat or Republican nominee, what
>are you going to do?
>Vote third-party? Stay home?
>Or write in somebody else?
>
>
>-Hawkeye-
>
>My Favorite Expo Tag Quotes:
>
>"It is fair to ask how
>much comes in with the
>five dollar application fees and
>how much went onto the
>ground.? Don Peay of
>SFW during 3/31/2005 Wildlife Board
>Meeting.
>
>"There will be a full accounting
>of how the applications fees
>are spent.? Don Peay
>of SFW - 9/26/2006 -
>Monstermuleys.com
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!
Captain_coues
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,458
There might be more to Stone than we know. I've thought for a while he might have a mild case of microcephaly. I just googled it and it looks like someone else thought the same thing. The article appears to be a joke, so I looked into it more. I can't find anything that says he doesn't have it. The only case I know about is Bettlejuice from the Howard Stern Show. I've listened to him as a guest on the show for years. It's obvious that there's intellectual disability in Bettlejuice. So we may need to give Stone a little break as he may not be all there.
https://archive.breitbartunmasked.com/2017/03/10/is-roger-stone-a-pinhead/
https://archive.breitbartunmasked.com/2017/03/10/is-roger-stone-a-pinhead/
Captain_coues
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,458
>
> I bet
>you were one of the
>first ones who cried when
>Donald supposedly mocked that man
>who had disabilities during his
>campaign rallies .
Actually no. I didn't see the big deal with that. Same thing as when Obama made a comment on the Special Olympics. Obama apologized, I didn't see the need for that. Jokes don't need apologies.
> I bet
>you were one of the
>first ones who cried when
>Donald supposedly mocked that man
>who had disabilities during his
>campaign rallies .
Actually no. I didn't see the big deal with that. Same thing as when Obama made a comment on the Special Olympics. Obama apologized, I didn't see the need for that. Jokes don't need apologies.
hossblur
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 10,590
>Another Trump friend going down. I'll
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
I could only think of one worse, and of course the dems ran her.
Are we EVER going to get to a Russian? After all this time I have yet to see one. Julian Assange ain't Russian. Stone ain't. Manafort ain't. At some point in a Russian collusion case, is there ever a Russian that colluded?
Manafort and Stone were hacks from the 70' s. Any chance we get to 2019 ever?
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.
>bet he ends up cooperating
>just like others have. Trump
>is horrible. He simply should
>not be our president. We
>can do much, much, much
>better.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
I could only think of one worse, and of course the dems ran her.
Are we EVER going to get to a Russian? After all this time I have yet to see one. Julian Assange ain't Russian. Stone ain't. Manafort ain't. At some point in a Russian collusion case, is there ever a Russian that colluded?
Manafort and Stone were hacks from the 70' s. Any chance we get to 2019 ever?
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.
hossblur
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 10,590
>Because I think Trump shouldn't be
>our President, I must be
>a liberal. Ow many republicans
>exist in this country? And
>you're telling me Trump is
>the best one out to
>be president? I sure disagree
>with that!!
>
>Man, you guys act as though
>no other choices on the
>planet exist.
>
>If you could eat anything on
>the planet, would you eat
>dog crap just cause it
>might taste better than monkey
>crap, or baby diarrhea, or
>some other nasty crap. Not
>me, I'd rather have a
>cheeseburger from Five Guys.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Founder, welcome to the lib club. Me and Grizz, and now Steve Rinella welcome you.
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.
>our President, I must be
>a liberal. Ow many republicans
>exist in this country? And
>you're telling me Trump is
>the best one out to
>be president? I sure disagree
>with that!!
>
>Man, you guys act as though
>no other choices on the
>planet exist.
>
>If you could eat anything on
>the planet, would you eat
>dog crap just cause it
>might taste better than monkey
>crap, or baby diarrhea, or
>some other nasty crap. Not
>me, I'd rather have a
>cheeseburger from Five Guys.
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Founder, welcome to the lib club. Me and Grizz, and now Steve Rinella welcome you.
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.
elkassassin
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 37,349
I'm gonna Ask one more F'N Time!
Who could We get that would Be Smart Enough for the Job?
But Dumb Enough to take the Job?
Answer Up Smart Boys!
I know so many people in so many places
They make allot of money but they got sad faces
It Ain't Easy being Me!
Who could We get that would Be Smart Enough for the Job?
But Dumb Enough to take the Job?
Answer Up Smart Boys!
I know so many people in so many places
They make allot of money but they got sad faces
It Ain't Easy being Me!
>>Because I think Trump shouldn't be
>>our President, I must be
>>a liberal. Ow many republicans
>>exist in this country? And
>>you're telling me Trump is
>>the best one out to
>>be president? I sure disagree
>>with that!!
>>
>>Man, you guys act as though
>>no other choices on the
>>planet exist.
>>
>>If you could eat anything on
>>the planet, would you eat
>>dog crap just cause it
>>might taste better than monkey
>>crap, or baby diarrhea, or
>>some other nasty crap. Not
>>me, I'd rather have a
>>cheeseburger from Five Guys.
>>
>>Brian Latturner
>>MonsterMuleys.com
>>@mm_founder on Instagram
>>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>>on Facebook!
>
>Founder, welcome to the lib club.
> Me and Grizz, and
>now Steve Rinella welcome you.
>
>
>
>From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN,
>PUBLIC LAND.
And CNN ?
>>our President, I must be
>>a liberal. Ow many republicans
>>exist in this country? And
>>you're telling me Trump is
>>the best one out to
>>be president? I sure disagree
>>with that!!
>>
>>Man, you guys act as though
>>no other choices on the
>>planet exist.
>>
>>If you could eat anything on
>>the planet, would you eat
>>dog crap just cause it
>>might taste better than monkey
>>crap, or baby diarrhea, or
>>some other nasty crap. Not
>>me, I'd rather have a
>>cheeseburger from Five Guys.
>>
>>Brian Latturner
>>MonsterMuleys.com
>>@mm_founder on Instagram
>>LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>>on Facebook!
>
>Founder, welcome to the lib club.
> Me and Grizz, and
>now Steve Rinella welcome you.
>
>
>
>From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN,
>PUBLIC LAND.
And CNN ?
RELH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 17,483
This arrest was a show of excessive force and shock value by the FBI. You do not gather a large arrest force and sneak up on a guy's house at 6 A.M. for a crime that Stone was charge with. This was not an arrest of a armed bank robber or person charged with a crime of violence that may resist. Also who tipped off CNN about the early morning arrest?
This was a dog and pony show done to generate maximum publicity and way out of norm for this type of arrest by the FBI. Mueller and his team have become a pack of wild dogs running amuck and you better be afraid of what they are becoming. I for one would not trust them to uphold the law and our rights under the Constitution.
RELH
This was a dog and pony show done to generate maximum publicity and way out of norm for this type of arrest by the FBI. Mueller and his team have become a pack of wild dogs running amuck and you better be afraid of what they are becoming. I for one would not trust them to uphold the law and our rights under the Constitution.
RELH
heywouldya
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,578
I don't know NeMont, maybe they are all incompetent. I think the list is up to 47 Clinton friends six feet under. Something is not right there.
hwy
hwy
elkassassin
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 37,349
>The standard answer ^^^
>
>A pack of dogs I tell
>you!
>
>*rolls eyes*
You mean Coyotes?
I know so many people in so many places
They make allot of money but they got sad faces
It Ain't Easy being Me!
>
>A pack of dogs I tell
>you!
>
>*rolls eyes*
You mean Coyotes?
I know so many people in so many places
They make allot of money but they got sad faces
It Ain't Easy being Me!
