>
LAST EDITED ON Dec-18-15
>AT 05:17?PM (MST)
>
>Just a few thoughts.
>Some used to complain about the
>200 permits. Non res
>have reason since fewer permits
>are available in the regular
>Non Res draw. I
>apply to 5 other states,
>for the most part Non
>Res get the short end
>of the stick every time.
>
>
>IF the 200 permits went back
>in the regular draw.
>Zero of the 5 dollar
>application fee goes to help
>wildlife.
>
>It looks like RMEF didn't write
>a detail proposal in some
>of the areas they were
>judged on. They didn't
>have a record in Utah
>for major conventions, like SFW/MDF
>did, which was some of
>the criteria.
>
>IMO both SFW and RMEF are
>both good groups with different
>areas of focus on wildlife.
> RMEF is more of
>a habitat, and purchasing easements
>for big game type group.
>
>
>As mentioned there is no reason
>why RMEF couldn't hold a
>convention in Utah, they have
>a larger membership by a
>long ways. That may
>help them secure future bids
>for the 200 tags?
>
>I would support two expos.
You'd Support 2 EXPO'S?
Where's them 200 Permits coming from?
I'm Living & Dieing with the Choices
I've Made!
Go Ahead!
Make Me take it down!
http://www.monstermuleys.info/photos/us
er_photos3/9001hank2.jpg