LAST EDITED ON Aug-27-09 AT 00:53AM (MST)[p]wow I must be way off, I was thinking low to mid 160's...170..maybe
Disclaimer:
The poster does not take any responsibility for any hurt or bad feelings. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster would like to remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor before they visit any discussion board.
Yeah you're probably right. He's got some short tines but overall great beams, height, mass etc. Why don't you just tag him and let me know how he adds up!?!?
Thanks for the help with the picture, here is my problem have a couple of bucks to choose from the one above, and I will try to post the other buck, this picture is approx three weeks old so hoping he has put on some more size. I believe this buck would score a little more not sure though.
I believe you are correct, buck number 2 is much nicer, maybe 15" nicer, than that one posted up top. Both pretty nice bucks and unless you have a bunch under your belt, you might want to shoot either of them and no one would blame you a bit.
I think the 1st buck will go in the 170s. The 2nd buck is definetly bigger, I would put him in the 180s pretty easily. Those eye gaurds are great and all forks and main beams are respectful, he would have my main attention.
The buck in the second picture is the better buck, he should go in the low 180's and the first is around 163. The right G2 and left G4 are too short. Nice pictures for sure.