I may, but your wallet wont like it. Keep in mind that the oly's have a very tiny sensor therefore you have to multiply the focal length of the lens by 2x in order to get the relative magnification. Now it does not magnify 2x, it only produces an image that is half the size of 35mm, giving the results of double magnification.
I also believe the oly has a built in image stabilization so what ever lens you put on it will get the benefit of stabilization.
I was thinking that the 250mm 2.8 giving you actually a 500 2.8 and with a 250 2.8 you could add a tele converter and still have good image quality, the 250 2.8 would be my lens of choice. . . However, i think they are about $6k or more. . . If you had that lens, and a couple of tele converters you could have a focal range from about 200mm on up to about 1000mm and carry only one lens, one body, and two teleconverters. . .
This is all conjecture on my part, i've never shot the oly's and i've never owned the lenses so I dont know how well my ideas would work. You can email cameraland and ask for joel, he will put you on the right track, he's an Oly guy and wont steer you wrong.
As for what else will work, i'm not sure, Oly does not offer a whole lot in the way of lenses. It's one reason I always tell people to buy a camera after you decide what you want to shoot and what lenses you want to own. . .
Good luck, and happy shooting.
www.tonybynum.com
"Roadless areas, in general, represent some of the best fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The bad news is that there is nothing positive about a road where fish and wildlife habitat are concerned -- absolutely nothing." (B&C Professor, Jack Ward Thomas, Fair Chase, Fall 2005, p.10).
