D
DougW
Guest
Hey guys...my posts are rare but I can't let this one go. Another media-based fiasco on this topic that I just can't let go.
Earlier this week the Denver Post did a SHORT blurb (always dangerous) about Wyoming's rejected proposal for management, as part of the quest for delisting.
Well, the last paragraph stated specifically that Wyoming's plan was to simply have the wolves shot on site.
I just about puked. I think the truth is a bit different from this statement, and the Post is only practicing poor journalism at best and unethical politicking at worst.
If I recall correctly (don't have time to go through the entire 100-pager from the Governor's office) shooting would be just about a last resort, and in only parts of the state where the presence of wolves would be an obvious fiasco towards the livestock community.
Am I correct?
Thanks,
Doug
Earlier this week the Denver Post did a SHORT blurb (always dangerous) about Wyoming's rejected proposal for management, as part of the quest for delisting.
Well, the last paragraph stated specifically that Wyoming's plan was to simply have the wolves shot on site.
I just about puked. I think the truth is a bit different from this statement, and the Post is only practicing poor journalism at best and unethical politicking at worst.
If I recall correctly (don't have time to go through the entire 100-pager from the Governor's office) shooting would be just about a last resort, and in only parts of the state where the presence of wolves would be an obvious fiasco towards the livestock community.
Am I correct?
Thanks,
Doug