Cozmo8
Active Member
- Messages
- 638
I apologize if this has been beaten to death here but I did not see any recent threads. I received a survey in the mail today about Sheep and Moose tags in Wy. Basically the proposal is to increase the random tags to 50% of the entire tag allocation. Applicants that have been in the draw a long time may get screwed by taking longer to draw. Applicants with fewer points benefit as more chances to win.
I think it is again a money grab to keep people with few points in. They are showing that the chances of drawing have increased with more random tags.
First they up the PP to $100. 25-30% of applicants disappear. Let's keep the applicants we have and maybe get some more suckers in. I do not like it. I am sure the people with few points (the greater pool of people) will go for it and the people with the most points (the smaller pool of people) will be against it. How do you think it will turn out? Of course, they will change it to 50-50. They can rationalize it by saying that the majority surveyed went for the new proposition. What do you do?
I think it is again a money grab to keep people with few points in. They are showing that the chances of drawing have increased with more random tags.
First they up the PP to $100. 25-30% of applicants disappear. Let's keep the applicants we have and maybe get some more suckers in. I do not like it. I am sure the people with few points (the greater pool of people) will go for it and the people with the most points (the smaller pool of people) will be against it. How do you think it will turn out? Of course, they will change it to 50-50. They can rationalize it by saying that the majority surveyed went for the new proposition. What do you do?