Yet, guys like you would come unglued if there were 45,222 people dying every year in plane crashes. You'd be squawking about how unsafe it is, how we need to take actions, do something.
Now do what % of people die at the hands of illegal immigrants. Yet, you want to sensationalize that and blame someone along with conservative media. Whats that number Flyjunkie?
Again, just stupid nonsense. Apparently I’m a liberal Democrat. Think I can show you how a gun works? Bet I can. It’s you who is f******* hilarious simply thinking things because you’ve been told that’s how it is. If I’m such a liberal Democrat, how do I own so many guns and know so much about them?
45,000 aren’t dying from at the hands of illegal immigrants entering the country but they’ll sensationalize ever case as “look look this is Joe’s fault” as they try to brush off deaths by firearms in the country.
Now let’s do stupid conservatives:
Don’t know but seems to be increasing everyday since Biden took office. It’s really just simple statistics. You let more illegals in through the border a percentage of those will commit crimes. I know that’s hard for you to comprehend but it’s just a fact.
Have you ever taken a statistics class or have any common sense?
What do you have to do to be able to legally drive?Vehicles are deadly too... maybe we should make common sense legislation to make it illegal to kill someone with a car. Background checks and waiting periods sound about right too.
View attachment 138418
Thanks. I noticed you didn't answer the question because you know the answer is an even smaller % than you are trying to defend on gun deaths.
Let's say there are no guns in the country. How many crimes are committed by guns? It is not us making the stupid points clown. We are pointing out how stupid your points are and how easy hypocrisy is the unmask.Have you ever taken a statistics class or have any common sense?
Let’s play a game, shall we? Let’s say there are no illegal immigrants in this country…how many crimes committed by illegals would we have? Let’s say we have a few hundred come in. A percentage would commit a crime, correct? Then let’s say we have a few thousand. Then hundreds of thousands. Then millions. See where this leads? Is that simple enough for ya? This isn’t hyperbole, simple facts. This cannot be argued.
You do realize a drivers license, test, and driving test, along with recertification at certain ages is a thing right? Again, this is too easy. There are also different and more tests depending on the type of vehicle you are driving. You walked face first into that wall didn't you?Vehicles are deadly too... maybe we should make common sense legislation to make it illegal to kill someone with a car. Background checks and waiting periods sound about right too.
View attachment 138418
Just glad you folks keep proving the point of who you are.
Oh I know I know. Tests, drivers license, driving test, different licenses for different classification of vehicles. These pdudes don't even see it before they walk right into it lol.
Do you have a right to own a fully automatic weapon? Requiring a test, or further background check or waiting period is not removing that right. Are you for removing background checks entirely? Then what are we talking about Homer? If it's an unimpeded right, shouldn't we remove every single gun law and let it be a free for all? Or....and maybe this....we are a civilized society based on laws and there are already banned guns and laws on guns in the US.
I nominate your sorry a** to go door to door collecting them.
Where in the constitution is the right to drive?
What law do you propose is going to stop gun violence?
You're an idiot. I own a lot of guns, again, I'm showing you how stupid your point is, and you bite again.
Where is your right to own a fully automatic weapon or not have to pass a background check to get a gun?
A more stringent process to purchase ALL semi-automatic weapons. From AR's to Glocks. I don't support banning any of them, but I do support a more strict buying process for semi-automatic weapons. PS again, you have no right to own a fully automatic weapon. Do you support those being legalized? Do you support removing all background checks and processes to buy guns? My guess is you don't. Does having to get a background check or fully automatic weapons being banned bar you from owning a gun? Nope it doesn't. There are already processes in place to buy a gun that invalidate your point of "it's a right". It's a terrible argument. Because you'd never say no background check should be done to purchase one, at least I'd hope not.
What about voting?
What about it?
Is it a right?
What do you have to do to exercise your right?
They're working on that....
What about proof of who you are?
How about all these illegal aliens, do you really believe they have a driver license.
Nope, what do you have to do to be able to vote?
I’ve found the ignore button works wonders
.....and don't compare registering to vote to gun registration....that is a child's argument
Why are ok with registration to vote, which is a violation of a right?
There are restrictions on Freedom of the Press, too.
The law is in effect prior, the penalty is after.
thehill.com
Lots of federal forms are punishable by law if filled out fraudulently.
Which proves that the test you're trying to apply is false.
What did you pay for your voter registration?
Everyone with a brain knew that was the plan all along. They have to make up for the black vote that are switching sides.
How many mass murders are committed with banned fully automatic weapons? You can do Chicago like Republicans like, or nutcase dudes who shoot up a crowd.
Yall are wild. You really have no idea how racism, discrimination, and segregation absolutely impacted communities to this day do you? The fact you mention those two specific cities up front kinda proves the point. You grew up like you did, and kids in the north side of Chicago grew up like they did largely due to the discrimination and rampant racism this country was founded on but you don’t wanna see it.
Answer these two questions Hoss.
They aren’t 85+% will vote for the Democratic Party in November for a reason. Keep telling yourself black voters like your party when nearly 90% will vote against your political ideology(for a reason).
Burgess Owens is worthless. He takes his photo ops on infrastructure projects Biden and Mitt funded in the state. But that dude sure wants credit for those projects when there’s a photo op huh? Joe wasn’t lying about that. Every congressional Utah representative has taken a photo opportunity and posted it on social media for infrastructure projects that only Mitt funded. Like Joe said, if you don’t want the money and jobs, just let him know.
Ahhh, the excuses are in. Now he was on drugs. Because of course it couldn’t be people grab 3 second clips and can make anyone look dumb over the course of an hour long speech. He made it through that hour and a half with quite a bit of energy for an 80 year old and it’s okay to admit that. Quite frankly every American should be wanting to see the President succeed whether they’re of the party or not.
You nominated Trump. I may still vote for RFK as a protest vote to the fact neither of them are great. I wasn’t going to vote for Joe with one exception, the nomination of the orange idiot. And we’re there. We’ll see, but yes, Biden is now in a bit more of a campaign mode and if he can prove he’s got the sort of energy as he does at the SOTU address it’ll be him or RFK.
Trump spent $7 trillion dollars and didn’t rebuild a bunch of bridges, build a bunch of wildlife bridges, extend internet to rural areas of the state, build chip manufacturing places so we’re less reliant on Taiwan, rebuild and take care of needed maintenance on current water infrastructure.
Just off the rails unhinged nonsense with no coherent thoughts again from good old elkass I ain’t proud of him, but he’s the lesser of two evils, Trump spent every bit as much money and quite frankly the money Trump spent did less. Thank Joe Biden and Mitt Romney for all those wildlife crossing that get built this year and the next few. He allocated $60 million in infrastructure funds to Utah for wildlife/vehicle mitigation alone(along with $20 million more in state funding thanks to Doug Owens(D) in the legislature). I’m simply pointing at actual projects the infrastructure law Trump couldn’t pass, Biden did and how it’s delivering for Utah. Because it is. And all your representatives love standing next to those projects for pics even though they explicitly voted for the project not to happen. All except Mitt anyway.
Ed Zachary.....
No, not really. However the US does need some form of immigration reform to fill lots of jobs in the coming years because American's aren't having kids. Fix the border, also fix the process to let people come to the country legally. They are both causing this issue. It can take years upon years to come legally. And wait according to Republican's minorities are going to vote in huge numbers for them! That's what I have heard, so this is an electoral victory for Republican's!
just STFU....
I was told that minorities are going to vote for Republican's this election cycle though! Polls are shifting, sleepy Joe showed he isn't so sleepy and is now in campaign mode. I'd be mad too. In the words of Tucker Carlson, boards like this are what "radicalize" me. If I vote for Joe, it'll be a lot because of the clear and obvious reason some of the MAGA folks can't be allowed to win or give that hate a breath of air.
The ignore feature is a wonderful thing
No one hates like you leftist's.....fact.
I had to look that one up
Chinese accent.....lolI had to look that one up
But I'm the one who can't handle words outside my echo chamber huh?
Yeah. The orange dude did the same thing and then also refused to give them back when told to. You care about when he did it too and refused to give them back right?
The orange dude actually had presidential rights to have top secret information.
Not only that but as a senator Biden couldn’t take any top secret materials from a SCIF.
Let me help you out on Biden's accomplishments.
