tworivers
Active Member
- Messages
- 808
Well one it is not new and it is one that concerns me, the establishment of Governer's Tags..... to be used by "Groups" such as RMEF MDF, and other acronym's.... Supposed to break down to help agency's , habitat, with a little 5% going to groups... This reminds me of a certain southern neighbor of ours..... I for one do not want to see Idaho follow the same path, and would like to know if any of you have additional info on this bill in paticular and the other one guaranteeing (sp) hunting right's.
My concern's with the first bill is doesn't our supertag's already go towards maintanence and or habitat? Or is it just to acquire access? If it address's all three why would we need a governers tag? How would a group accomplish this on a level that would even be significant?
b. The foot is in the door, and we have the same situation as exist's down south of us.
c, Don't our membership fees in those same groups achieve what is being set forth?
Have any of you read the bills and or thoughts?
Freedom is not Free!
RIP Lil Bro' "Huntnfever"
My concern's with the first bill is doesn't our supertag's already go towards maintanence and or habitat? Or is it just to acquire access? If it address's all three why would we need a governers tag? How would a group accomplish this on a level that would even be significant?
b. The foot is in the door, and we have the same situation as exist's down south of us.
c, Don't our membership fees in those same groups achieve what is being set forth?
Have any of you read the bills and or thoughts?
Freedom is not Free!
RIP Lil Bro' "Huntnfever"