Looks like things will get serious now. How much money is being funneled into this guys pockets by his wealthy friends to take this up the ladder??
I think it does tell us he’s ready to take it to SCOTUS. **** ton of money for all of this for sure and I hope he loses and his rancher friends hang him for being such a jackass in pushing this case like he did.He'll lose again. What's right is right. Funny how they inflate the lawyers backgrounds. Are we suppose to be impressed?
Good lawyers get access to favorable judges. Judge shopping is real. Justice is not blind anymore.First, Eshelman must have a ton of money. Second, I reviewed the Unlawful Inclosures Act of 1885. Seems pretty clear that individuals can't prevent access to public land.
Oh well. Lawyers are paid to argue for and defend their clients, and to try to find loopholes. Hoping ol Fred gets sent home again.
Yeah he appears to be in this for the long haul. It is now just a Civil case? There is no criminal aspect left as the men charged were found not guilty by jury. So the only thing he can hope for is a civil settlement, which does not appear to solve the issue at all...
If he fails that only helps. But if he wins, I am not sure it is a real win for him or us...
This guy must be tremendous A-Hole to keep pushing this. No one should ever be able to block access to public land. It should never happen.
I don’t think this has to do with what he believes is right. It’s in his financial interest to win this and its money that is driving this from his side.He thinks he is right. I don’t blame him for fighting for what he believes is right. The hunters and others involved on the other side of this are doing the same. I happen to think they are right and the landowner is wrong, but I don’t begrudge him for exhausting his remedies to fight for what he believes. If the law is clear, let it get settled once and for all at the appellate level.
I doubt the SCOTUS takes this case. Hope for a win at the 10th Circuit because I doubt the SCOTUS would grant cert.
Or... He doesn't give a crap about the money, and simply wants his playground to stay his playground. And like others say, he isn't used to losing...I don’t think this has to do with what he believes is right. It’s in his financial interest to win this and its money that is driving this from his side.
So if someone locks you out of some land or a place you have a legal right to access, and you have met him on the road, and he says he’s not taking the locked gate down, then what? Just take your marbles and go home?Serve him, the good book says meet your adversary on the rd to the courthouse to work things out. Taking others to court isn't turning the other cheek.
The richest man in the cemetery isn’t the smartestOr... He doesn't give a crap about the money, and simply wants his playground to stay his playground. And like others say, he isn't used to losing...
Sounds like in that verse, he was referring to a situation where you are accused of wronging someone. He says to make it right with them, because otherwise you may end up in jail and penniless
I don’t see how that applies.
View attachment 122920
It applies perfectly to post#18. Hard to spin it any other way, but feel free. You can try Matt 5: 40 for more clarity.
I disagree. And this my friend is why we have so many denominations of Christianity.It applies perfectly to post#18. Hard to spin it any other way, but feel free. You can try Matt 5: 40 for more clarity.
Denominations are all man-made...not of God. Moe, imo you are taking scripture out of context in order to promote your personal views or just wanting to sow discourse. Jesus taught a multitude of lessons in the Sermon on the Mount. It's mostly about not putting our trust and faith into the things of this world but to put our treasures and efforts into things of God.