LAST EDITED ON Jan-10-12 AT 09:32PM (MST)[p]>
LAST EDITED ON Jan-10-12
>AT 09:16?PM (MST)
>
>See........they're are some folks that would
>like to get us to
>believe that this movement and
>this effort is about having
>to pick between hunting every
>year, or hunting less so
>you can hunt deer with
>large antlers. In their
>world, high quality is large
>antlers, yes?
>
>Ask yourself this. WHY DON'T
>THEY SAY, "Some want opportunity,
>some want to stop the
>decline of our deer populations."
> or at the very
>least, "Some want opportunity, some
>want higher quality, and some
>want to stop the decline
>of our deer populations".
So is it mysticism that leads you to believe a 25/100 buck to doe ratio and higher is going to drastically improve our deer numbers? Sell me on it with some facts and I'll stop hunting deer until we have a "million" deer once again. You know, like we had "very few" years ago.
Do you honestly believe, without divisive intent, that this is the solution to doubling or tripling the statewide estimates?
You saying that this is all dissonant code talk is no different than someone saying that we had a million deer "a few" years ago. You stated yourself that your words are propaganda. So what is it? It is propaganda to sell people on what you might call "opportunists" as they who want to be out in the field at all cost? What I see most of the time is people not buying the nonsense that goes against any scientific information available and secondly, a difference in philosophy.
Balance and rational thought, Deloss. Show me a viable way and I'll jump on your wagon and ride it wherever you take me.
Lastly, what are we giving vs. what we are gaining? I don't know anyone who wouldn't sit out hunting mule deer if they thought it was the solution.
Do you only want to give credit for words that fit under the umbrella of your agenda, no matter how noble it may be? Again, it's a difference in philosophy. You see certain ways to get there, some see another.
http://unitedwildlifecooperative.org