Cali4x4
Active Member
- Messages
- 754
Are you guys actually implying that law enforcement should NOT be able to ”meet with” Big Media about information trafficked on their sites?
Have we found an actual person yet who says they would have voted for trump instead of biden if twitter hadn’t censored hunters laptop?
It was 10% of something so it shouldn’t be that hard.
And remind me again what we’re going to find when we finally get to look at it? A list would be helpful.
For the record, I was not manipulated by tweeter. And if you were you are prolly a dipchit anyway.
Does it? Rudy has allegedly had the files for YEARS (how the post got them I believe). Waiting for the right time to spring them I suppose.79% say ‘truthful’ coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop would have changed 2020 election
Among Republicans, 57% were strongly convinced Trump would have won, compared to 48% of independents and just 44% of Democrats.nypost.com
It shows Uncle Joe, "the big guy" taking bribes from foreign countries
Have we found an actual person yet who says they would have voted for trump instead of biden if twitter hadn’t censored hunters laptop?
It was 10% of something so it shouldn’t be that hard.
at it?
HikeHunt61, the 10% was the payoff for "the big guy". The laptop from hell contains information on pay to play grifting done by the Biden crime family. The FBI had this laptop for over 3 years.Well, we'll never know right? But smaller scandals have been blamed for election losses in close contests. Hillary surely blamed Comey for her loss (among other things).
It's obvious that some people would have voted differently had there been a "scandal". 10%? Hardly likely. But 1%? Maybe. It isn't obvious to me that it would have changed the final result.
It's not your reading. It is Bluehole's writing that sucksDang- I hate it when my reading comprehension sucks. Getting old I guess!
10% was the number quoted by junkie for the number of people who would have changed their vote. It’s where I pointed out 87.3% of all statistics are pulled out of a rw nutjobs azz.It's not your reading. It is Bluehole's writing that sucks
Post in thread 'shadow banning'"10% for the Big Guy"
Hey, did you get a chance to look up the answer to those questions? You might have to venture out of the Vortex of TRUTH.It's not your reading. It is Bluehole's writing that sucks
Lotta folks placing a lotta faith in that harddrive.10% for the Big Guy
OK, I'll bite- what does Trump have to do with the laptop business?Have you even considered the possibility that this is just trump f#ck!ng you again?
I’m buckled in prepared whichever way it goes. Are you?
OK, I'll bite- what does Trump have to do with the laptop business?
Beyond that- stupid politicians can't help themselves. Left and Right must have their pound of flesh. Both Trump investigation/trials were a huge waste of time. So will the Hunter investigation that is sure to come. So, being what it is, popcorn and beer is the only sane approach.
If nothing was there. Then why did the 3 letter agencies react so strongly to suppress the story in 2020?Besides his surrogates peddling the hunter files to the media, trump seems to an enthusiastic supporter of getting hunters dick pics out there to as many people as he can.
And his very quest for a third impeachment hangs on hunters laptop. Besides that, nothing.
I miss the good old ”lock her up!” days.
Google New Federal State of China for the purported source of the hunter files. Careful, you’ll be descending into a left-wing vortex. Skepticism advised.
Might make for a good HBO comedy series. Clinton and Giuliani could be their lawyers. Maxwell right across the hall. Hunter and Don Jr would share a cell and be running cigarette rackets to keep from being molested. The WHOLE prison could house just politicians and their cronies. Wait... maybe that's not as funny as I thought...I hope trump and joe get adjoining cells
I agree that the censorship aspect is a bigger deal than hunters dick pics.Twitter Files Conceal Bigger Scandal: FBI Lied To Election-Meddle
Not only did the FBI prompt Twitter and Facebook to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, the bureau did so by deceiving the companies.thefederalist.com
An opinion piece……..”Mr. Hamburger teaches at Columbia Law School and is CEO of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.”First article I've read that reasonably lays out how the cooperation between the DOJ and social media may actually be a crime. Oh- and it's the WSJ, not Breitbart...
Opinion | Is Social-Media Censorship a Crime?
If tech execs cooperated with government officials, it might be a conspiracy against civil rights.www.wsj.com
This exchange demonstrates everything that is wrong with our political discourse. Taibbi's first statement makes it sound like the FBI isn't chasing bad guys (which is wrong of course). Lieu jumps on that and avoids Taibbi's excellent point about the social media operation.
For “legal process response”. Damn, I wish I could have been paid that time Clinton came to town and ruined my business for a week.Wait- what? The FBI PAID twitter? JSMN...
I have an idea...What should it cost to keep kiddie porn and such off the internet?
The laws that pop culture dipchits pass? So it’s back to founder being responsible for the garbage I spew here?I have an idea...
How about whatever the laws and regulations are- the business's are required to follow them, and they can be charged or sued for not doing so?
But we pay them? AND have the FBI tell them things MIGHT be wrong and thus they should take action? This is Orwellian...
Yup.Our govt. paid twitter $3.4 million to censor us, that we know about. How much did they pay google, facebook, youtube etc.?
Blue you sure like to push the kiddie porn angle. From what I have read there is more on lap top involving INCEST. You are the only echo chamber writing about kiddie porn. Have you been looking at it? Just so you know that would be illegal. Nothing in the New York Times article was putting out there had any kiddie porn. We can only guess were you get your misinformation from.For “legal process response”. Damn, I wish I could have been paid that time Clinton came to town and ruined my business for a week.
What should it cost to keep kiddie porn and such off the internet?
I disagree with your figures. More like 90% wrong. Biden already has a "Disinformation Czar" It is what the FBI has been doing all along. They are the source of misinformation. The FBI is the democrats puppet.Ya, I'm just looking at the history of FBI involvement. I think they are 90% doing what we want them to do and need them to do. It's the 10% where they have shown bad actions (like Steele Dossier, and now the "remove the Biden laptop stuff- it's obviously disinfo") that needs curing. They are too powerful to allow them to make guesses and then apply pressure.
I also agree that we don't need more Patriot Act. But Biden's "disinformation czar" would have been equally as bad. Both sides love control...
Relax, if you get your way you’ll still be able to get whatever depravity you desire. But don’t be the poster boy for the proscribed degrees of consanguinity.Blue you sure like to push the kiddie porn angle. From what I have read there is more on lap top involving INCEST. You are the only echo chamber writing about kiddie porn. Have you been looking at it? Just so you know that would be illegal. Nothing in the New York Times article was putting out there had any kiddie porn. We can only guess were you get your misinformation from.
View attachment 97439
The laptop is about business dealing with foreign countries and foreign business. Some of these business directed controlled by the CCP and Ukraine. Did you know there is a war in Ukraine? Could Obummer and the Biden crime family have been grabbing funds from the Russians neighbor? Helped ignite the conflict? More about the $86K a month for the "smartest man" Joe knows.
I identify as a conspiracy theorist. MY PRONOUMS ARE I/ TOLD/ YOU / SO
This guy is a moron. I’m only glad my business partners aren’t that dumbInterview of Tony Bobulinski. Why does this whistleblower not get the same fawning the CNN's and other mainstream outlets gave Vindman?
Bobulinski received his commission as an officer at the Officer Training Command in Newport, Rhode Island, in August 1995 and left active duty in December 1999, the Navy said. He was listed in the Navy reserves until June 2006.
Yes. Take it easy, don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy.Relax, if you get your way you’ll still be able to get whatever depravity you desire. Come back when you have an original thought.
Back to twitter, it appears the US military made use of the Media-Police-Military Industrial Complex.
I’m reminded of the Weezer Sweater song. Keep pulling that thread.
Twitter Aided Pentagon Propaganda Campaigns across Middle East, Amplifying Agency-Aligned Accounts | National Review
Documents released in the eighth installment of ‘The Twitter Files’ revealed that Twitter actively cooperated in Pentagon-sponsored intelligence operations.www.nationalreview.com
Do you not understand that this was reportedly occurring under the trump admin? Open your eyes.I disagree with your figures. More like 90% wrong. Biden already has a "Disinformation Czar" It is what the FBI has been doing all along. They are the source of misinformation. The FBI is the democrats puppet.
The FBI publicly discredited FACTUAL information. Claiming the Biden laptop was Russian propaganda. In 2020 the most watched cable news host Tucker Carlson ran a story about the laptop. Interviewed Hunter's business partner Tony Bobulinski. CNN, MSNBC. All of Blue's heros in the media claimed Tucker was spreading diss-information. Called him and others a "puppet of Putin".
Who do you think told the mainstream media outlets to say this? Yes, it was the FBI using all of the media to disseminate lies and miss truths. Interfering with a U.S. election. Leslie Stahl of 60 minutes, interviewing Trump prior to the election would not let him speak of the lap top. It is "unverified" she claimed. During the debate Chrissy Wallace played the same game. No discussion of the laptop. "unverified".
Then the letter from the 51 intelligence officers. This is shameful. The deep fake state has lost it's way.
View attachment 97440
This is udder stupidity.Yes. Take it easy, don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy.
Of course the pentagon is pushing their war machine on Twatter, Facecrack, Gaggle and etc.. Same reason ole Lizzy Cheny has her panities in a wad over #45. Lot's of money to be made selling weapons to these countries. Even when these countries can't afford the weapons. The money can be had from dollars collected from the US tax payers. ie: Ukraine.
Your damn right it was. This was an attempted cou from the FBI. The FBI is part of the Executive branch. The Executive Branch consists of the agencies and departments that take direction from the President and their cabinet. Do you recall James Comey the disgraced former FBI director? Laughing about how he "set up" General Flynn at the start of Trump's presidency? "I wouldn't have done this to the Obama administration."Do you not understand that this was reportedly occurring under the trump admin? Open your eyes.
You know, all these investigations would be easier to dismiss as witch hunts if they didn’t all end with indictmentsYour damn right it was. This was an attempted cou from the FBI. The FBI is part of the Executive branch. The Executive Branch consists of the agencies and departments that take direction from the President and their cabinet. Do you recall James Comey the disgraced former FBI director? Laughing about how he "set up" General Flynn at the start of Trump's presidency? "I wouldn't have done this to the Obama administration."
Ya know if the frikin mainstream media could actually provide news. Investigate and come out and tell the public what they told us is now known as being lies. The reason is all about the money follow the money. We no know the FBI was paying Twatter directly to play along with suppressing factual information. Labeling it as misinformation.
I have no problem with anyone going to jail if they are found guilty of crimes. ANYONE.From NBC more FBI criminal activities. Directed towards the president of the United States. Get's a slap on the wrist.
Jan. 29, 2021, 9:59 AM PST
By Pete Williams
A former FBI lawyer was sentenced Friday to probation, avoiding a prison sentence, for falsifying a claim made to sustain government surveillance on a key figure in the Mueller investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
Kevin Clinesmith admitted last August that he had altered an internal FBI email in the course of seeking a court's permission to continue government surveillance of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser. The warrant for approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has been a flashpoint for conservative critics of the FBI and the Mueller investigation.
Page himself addressed the judge before the sentence was imposed, saying the disclosures that he was being investigated had resulted in death threats.
"This manufactured scandal and associated lies caused me to adopt the lifestyle of an international fugitive for years," Page told the hearing, conducted by video conference because of the pandemic. "I often have felt as if I had been left with no life at all. Each member of my family was severely impacted."
Emails released this week by Musk and reported by journalist Michael Shellenberger revealed that the censorship of the Post‘s reporting on the Biden family business scheme was an operation led by the FBI, in conjunction with Twitter. Shellenberger’s reporting revealed that federal agents “discredited factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both after and *before* The New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14, 2020″ — working with top management at Twitter to censor and disparage the Post‘s reporting. Shellenberger’s reporting showed that the narrative that the Post‘s 2020 reporting was part of an alleged “hack-and-leak” attack by “Russia” was conceived by the FBI — a narrative that was also adopted by legacy media as justification for their refusal to broadcast the story.“The correspondence between the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples of our traditional, longstanding and ongoing federal government and private sector engagements, which involve numerous companies over multiple sectors and industries. As evidenced in the correspondence, the FBI provides critical information to the private sector in an effort to allow them to protect themselves and their customers. The men and women of the FBI work every day to protect the American public. It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency.”
Suddenly everyone who was a statistician just a year ago is a constitutional scholar.So the FBI claims that they have been doing this with all of legacy media. "For a long time." Just because they have been violating the constitution, breaking the law for a long time does not make it legal.