LAST EDITED ON Jul-09-14 AT 08:38AM (MST)[p]>>HJB- Interesting take on the subject.
>> As a Committee member,
>>I would hope you have
>>a little more compassion for
>>a hunter who files a
>>complaint. The fact he
>>filed the complaint should be
>>enough to take it seriously.
>> If the hunter can
>>not show up for a
>>full day meeting (which many
>>were previously) without a time
>>specific hearing then it should
>>not be held against them.
>> And FYI, Mr John
>>came before multiple CWMU hearings
>>I attended. The CWMU
>>Committee had no authority to
>>grant any restitution. The
>>CWMU could only recommend actions
>>to the Wildlife Board, which
>>were limited. "Letter in
>>the File" or "Probation".
>>No authority to restore points,
>>money, or any compensation to
>>the hunter. The CWMU
>>Committee could only deal with
>>CWMU and even that was
>>very minimal.
>
>Packout,
>
> I'm currently on
>the CWMU committee and I
>know how it operates. I
>never once said the CWMU
>committee had the authority to
>make decisions. However, I think
>if the CWMU committee presents
>a very detailed report and
>suggestion to the wildlife board,
>it should pass. The wildlife
>board strongly considers the suggestions
>from the committee.
>
>As for the complaint process, I'm
>trying to help people understand
>that they need to stand
>up and fight for the
>right to hunt CWMUs. I
>feel terrible for anyone that
>has a bad experience on
>a CWMU and I want
>to do anything in my
>power to help that person.
>However, if they don't take
>the necessary steps to file
>a formal complaint and show
>up to the hearing (which
>is a few hours, not
>all day) there is little
>the committee and board can
>do to help them. I
>understand people are busy, but
>if you got screwed over
>on your dream hunt, wouldn't
>you think it would be
>worth taking the day off
>to work it out?
>
>I'm not sure why you think
>I'm attacking the public hunter.
>I represent the public hunter
>and want to do everything
>I possibly can to help
>the program and better the
>experience for the public hunter.
>I have spent the last
>2 two years gathering my
>thoughts and others thoughts for
>improvement of the program. I
>want nothing more than to
>see the CWMU program succeed.
>If you have a personal
>vendetta against me for some
>odd reason, please PM me
>and we can work it
>out.
Packout, HJB,
Actually, I didn't take your responses personally ether way, but I appreciate both of you considering it. We were quite nieve to the CWMU complaint process back then and were prompted to make the complaints only after talking to a more savvy friend about the hunt and, thus, our complaint probably wasn't as timely as it should have been (about a month later). In any case, the hunt wasn't that big of a deal to us at the time and we just considered the experience a learning opportunity. And, after all, we did spend some quality time together, albeit more work than play. We just didn't get to try cow moose meat until 2 years later when I shot one on public land a bit south of Hardscrabble.
And, FWIW, me and, on two occasions, two of my other adult kids have also had antlerless tags (deer) on Heaston East/Kennecott CWMU and one time had a bad experience, but the other time a great experience. I, personally, am in favor of the CWMU program as long as the CWMU complies with the DWR and CWMU Organization laws and rules. And as long as the public hunters are as valuable as the paying hunters. And, as long as the animals, not the money, are the bottom line.