>
LAST EDITED ON Feb-07-19
>AT 03:44?PM (MST)
>
>>Founder.
>>
>>Your answer was interesting. It
>>was like the miss America
>>pageant contestants who are for
>>world peace and ending hunger.
>>
>>
>>'m all for decreasing success rates
>>and increasing opportunity. How
>>does your sevice accomplish either?
>> Keep in mind I
>>believe your as good as
>>you claim to be.
>>
>>We probably agree more on outfitters.
>> I'm not totally anti
>>outfitter, private land is private
>>land. I'm not sure
>>how all the other consumptive
>>users on public pay a
>>consumption or extractive rate and
>>guides don't.
>>
>>I'm not being sarcastic. I
>>really want this challenged in
>>court. The tech hunting industry
>>is the wild west.
>>Something needs to happen.
>>
>>I am not a real fan
>>of the "ethics" argument other
>>than I guess that's technically
>>what game laws are.
>>But you have yet to
>>explain how this benefits the
>>resource, increases opportunity, or decreases
>>success rates.
>>
>>Last. You keep claiming how
>>minor this industry is.
>>Care to share how many
>>packages you sold? I
>>know at least one, but
>>if we are truly talking
>>5-6 dudes combined between the
>>sites, I agree its meaningless.
>> But I can't figure
>>out why the outfitters would
>>spend 2 years pushing, if
>>these sites weren't actual competition.
>> I run a super
>>tiny Buisness. I doubt highly
>>any of my bigger competitors
>>even know I'm alive.
>>
>>
>>From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN,
>>PUBLIC LAND.
>
>I'm not saying my ?selling? reports
>is helping deer, but I
>also shoot a high powered
>rifle that's killed more deer
>than the guys I've helped.
>
>There are bigger things. This is
>a big deal because they're
>making it a big deal.
>
>I'd bet that between myself and
>that site someone mentioned, that
>we're helping maybe 10 people
>combined. And of the 10
>people, 95% who killed a
>deer, would?ve killed one without
>my help. It's not like
>people stay home from hunting
>if I'm not here to
>help.
>What I do effects success rate
>by almost nothing. Nor does
>it effect opportunity. It has
>an ever so small effect
>on the average age of
>bucks harvested, as a few
>guys might get the older
>buck I pointed them to.
>
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>@mm_founder on Instagram
>
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Ok. I don't like the practice obviously. I do agree I think their are a LOT bigger fish to fry. Ill give you in old school, my dad and granddad would have disowned me for spending $1400 for a deer location. I read and look at your stuff. Seems like even 10 guys that dent your 190-200 class, would irradicate it based on what you say you see.
Not my sword. Ill fall on another one. But I will say my shock is that YOU do this. I've read your interviews about hard work, being there earlier, later, longer. I guess I'm a little more shocked that YOU are offereing up the easy way for someone to bypass the other dudes who are doing it the way you do. If it wasn't a shortcut, or an easy route, it wouldn't be worth a dime.
I hope it passes and you get a civil rights attorney to challenge. Then at least there would be some baseline.
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.