I have been hunting with only Muzzleloaders since 1990 except for that bad choice to any weapon general bull elk hunt in 1996 to help a co-worker out. My understanding of laws of physics is that if I put a bigger scope on my 58 cal. 1/66 twist barrel I will be able to get that round ball out there to 800 or a 1000 yards so I can shoot elk on a dead run across a canyon in a snow storm? Or will that big round chunk of lead with bad ballistic coefficient loose energy and fall out of the sky just as quickly as it did with my original iron sights?
I have 7 different muzzleloading rifles and I have killed game with 5 of them. Everything from moose, elk X 3, deer lost count, to coyote's and even shoot the heads off of blue grouse setting in the pines at 30 yards (most of the time with 1st shot). I did all of this with open sights or a 1X scope and I just started using them about 8 years ago because I started to get old people vision. My point is this will only encourage people that most likely have no concept of physics to try and do what I explained just because they have a very good sight picture out to 600 yards now. Anyone that believe they will get a muzzleloading rifle to humanly kill big game beyond 250 yards is no sportsman and I would only do that with my modern in lines. Ethics is a big part of being a sportsman, I have let many deer/elk walk away as I shook my head and said 30 years ago I would have been carrying a 25-06/338 Win Mag. and your life would have ended today. Part of muzzeloading weapon system is that the sportsman has put self-imposed restrictions on them self's. And yes 2 years ago I did mount a 2.5 X 8 Leopold VX III I had laying around on one of my Austin Hallicks. I keep a bullet drop starting at 100 yards in 25 yard increments out to 250 yds. and wind drift chart with 10 MPH increments laminated to the side of that rifle just in case I do see that nice animal that would have been in range for my 338 Win Mag.