What are your thoughts on this? Seems like every year score is becoming more and more talked about in the size of animals and quality of the actual hunt? Or is it just me? Just saying in general, magazines, articels, internet, etc etc. I like to have an idea what something scores if I harvest something but take it only with a grain of salt. Naturally I want to harvest big animals just like the next person but thats just one aspect of hunting and in my opinion some people are placing too much attention on score weather it was a good or poor hunt or if the animals harvested is worthy. I know theres people out there that might say for example, I wont shoot a buck less than 180 inches or a bull less than 300 inches. And if so and so happens to shot a buck or bull that falls just short of the mark, becomes disappointed. I remember years ago in my neck of the woods, a big elk would be referred to a big 6 point instead of a 350 bull or whatever and the same theory with the other critters. Things change with time and realize this might be just a evolution of the sport, for better or worse...
Just curious what peoples view on the topic.
Just curious what peoples view on the topic.