RE: 30-378 Accumark
>I totally agree, don't get this
>gun if you don't reload.
> Otherwise it's about $4.00
>every time you pull the
>trigger.
>
>If you reload, you can do
>it for about $1.00 per
>round, less if you use
>cheaper bullets/primers/powder.
>
>My gun likes the 180 grain
>Accubonds the best.
>
>It's a fun gun to shoot
>and one of the prettiest
>guns you'll see at the
>range.
>
>Only complaint I have is it
>is PUNISHINGLY LOUD.
>
>Use your hearing protection.
Current price for off the shelf 30-378 ammo is $102 per box of twenty. I know that I went to public schools for my education but that is over $5 per shot.
I reload shooting Sierra Match Kings. If I can get 4 shots per piece of brass, it still costs me $3.30 per round. If you have some contacts that get me reloading supplies cheap enough to load for a buck per shot, please share it. I could use the savings.
http://www.handloads.com/calc/loadingCosts.asp
The above link will help you figure out exactly what it is you are spending for reloads.
MtMuley is exactly right. The .300 RUM is neck and neck with big weatherby from 26" barrels and light bullets (165 & 180). But, the big Bea really starts to shine with the heavier bullets (200, 220, even 240) and a little longer barrels (28"-30").
A heavy .30 cal bullet with its higher BC will buck the wind much better, drop less, and carry more energy down range than the lighter bullets making it a better choice for long range shooting that the .300 RUM. Don't get me wrong...the RUM is still excellent for LR shooting but the as the saying goes, a fast heavy bullet beats a fast light bullet every time. If you plan to shoot the 165 and 180 grain bullets, stay with the RUM.