LAST EDITED ON Mar-12-12 AT 05:43PM (MST)[p]Txhunter, those are good points, about the weight and stock design. When my own son was 12, he started out shooting my .264. It was a model 70 westerner with 26" bbl, so a heavy rifle to begin with. I'd re-stocked it with a Brown Precision stock with a nice soft Pachmayer decellerator pad, and that gun barely kicks at all. As a 12 year old, he shot 2 bucks with it and still loves that gun. He won a rem700 in 270 at a FNAWS convention in Reno, so that's the rifle he mostly hunts with the last 8 or 9 years.
I'm not trying to pick an arguement with those who advocate heavy magnums, as I personally shoot a 338 for most of my own rifle hunting, but when the subject is a 12 year old, I fail to see the logic. A 270 is plenty of gun, even for elk. Between my son and I, we've shot a 270 to take a couple greater kudu, a burchells zebra, sable, several mature bull elk, a big Alaskan moose, several caribou, as well as plenty of smaller animals, and nearly every single one has been a one or two shot kill. Quality bullets in a 270, shot at reasonable ranges, are far more important than shooting a big magnum. Even though I hunt mostly with a 338, I often wonder why I don't use my 270 a lot more. When choosing a light rifle, I normally go with my 264, though a 270 is every bit as good out to 350 yards, IMO. A 270 of about 7 1/2-8 pounds, with scope and fully loaded, and with a good recoil pad, is a very easy rifle to shoot, and very effective at killing just about anything.