202typical
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,123
Friday, April 06, 2007
Peter Jennings and Chris Matthews
To understand the mindset of the Modern Liberal and why it is he will invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, let's take the beliefs of two of the top leftist ?journalists? of recent times.
When Peter Jennings, not long ago one of only three monolithic New York City newsmen charged with informing the public about the goings on around the globe, died recently, his colleague, Barbara Walters could think of no better way to eulogize him than to say ?what made Peter great was that he knew there was no such thing as the truth.?
This, of course, leaves one to wonder just what, exactly, Jennings was reporting every night. If, as his colleague of thirty years claims, he didn't believe truth existed, what was the criterion he employed in choosing the stories he would report and the way in which he would spin them?
The answer is that, since Jennings? job is to report the truth ? and, to him, the truth is that there is no such thing as the truth ? Jennings? sole job is to manipulate the evidence in his reports to undermine the beliefs of others by championing those things society recognizes as evil, wrong and failed and by tearing down that which the people recognize as good, right and successful.
This, of course, sees the Modern Liberal like Jennings (and Walters, apparently, since she thought not believing in the truth was the single quality that made her friend ?great?) manipulate the evidence ? Michael Moore it, if you will ? for no other purpose than to disabuse others of their belief in the truth.
Since the vast majority of Americans believe America to be good, then, it becomes the very job of people like Jennings to ?prove? that that belief isn't founded in truth by focusing only on the misdeeds, the short-comings and the set-backs America and Americans suffer. Similarly, since most Americans believe that the word of Jesus Christ is the truth, Jennings? job is nothing other than to cherry-pick, spin and manipulate the evidence ? to do whatever is necessary to do his job well ? to ?prove? that this belief is misguided.
Since ?there's no such thing as the truth,? then, Jennings (et al) are not rooted to fact and evidence, and lying does not bother them one bit. After all, in a world where there is no truth, what is a ?lie,? anyway?
Consider a speech given recently by leftist newsman Chris Matthews of the TV show ?Hardball,? to the children at the University of Toronto. Being a Modern Liberal Matthews began his talk by telling the children that the Islamic fascists ?aren't evil? (they simply have ?another way of looking at things.?)
But Matthews has a problem, assuming he has the slightest bit of human decency and recognizes that the cold-blooded mass murder of innocent people ? be they the thousands on 9/11 or the children in kindergartens in Russia and Israel ? is an evil act, how does he gibe his two positions? How does he explain people who ?aren't evil,? committing such heinous crimes in so many places around the globe?
The answer is that Matthews has to ? simply has to ? find, invent and distort any and all wrongs done to the murderers for, while cold-blooded mass murder is evil, ?justifiable homicide? isn't even a crime. In fact, justifiable homicide might even be considered an act of heroism in just the way so many on the left consider the terrorists to be heroes and ?freedom fighters.?
Yet it is not enough for Mathews to simply fabricate or exaggerate misdeeds America or Americans may have done, just as it is not enough to justify shooting someone simply because they broke into your home. If the burglar is stealing your stereo and running out the door and you shoot him, you have committed a crime. The only way for this not to be a crime is if the criminal is attacking you or your children, raping your wife, or strangling your mother.
Thus, in order to justify the violence of the Arab/Islamic world, the Modern Liberal like Matthews cannot simply point to minor misdeeds or wrongs America or Americans may have committed, but he needs to then exaggerate those wrongs to the point where they equal the evil visited upon the innocent.
Thus Ward Churchill, another powerful Modern Liberal, had no choice ? simply no choice ? but to call the innocent victims of 9/11 all ?little Eichmanns,? for, since the terrorists had created a miniature holocaust (lower case ?h? as in an all-encompassing and hellish fire), the only way the Modern Liberal could justify these murders and ?prove? the terrorists ?aren't evil,? is by calling the victims miniature Eichmanns.
When Chris Matthews, then, or Peter Jennings or Barbara Walters and the rest of the leftist news media portray America as the ultimate in evil it is specifically because we are the greatest of good. These evils need to be invented and exaggerated merely to justify the vicious and evil attacks which the Modern Liberal has already decided ? the day they entered kindergarten ? cannot be the work of evil people.
This is exactly the same dynamic behind the Modern Liberals hatred of Israel. The Democrats have no choice but to call Israel ?Nazis? not because they are but because the Arabs are. The Arabs/Moslems supported Hitler in World War II and after the war Nazis fled to Egypt and Syria and throughout the Arab world where they knew they'd be welcomed and feel at home.
The Nazis taught the Arabs/Moslems the ?tricks? they now use against the Jews of Israel ? not least of which is the messages taught to the ?youth,? and the Nazi-style propaganda techniques employed in the government controlled Arab press. In order to justify the Nazi tactics employed by the Arabs and the Moslems, then, the Modern Liberal has no choice but to not only invent ?wrongs? committed by the victims in Israel, but to elevate those wrongs to exactly the level of the evil that the Modern Liberal invariably and inevitably champions.
Peter Jennings and Chris Matthews
To understand the mindset of the Modern Liberal and why it is he will invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, let's take the beliefs of two of the top leftist ?journalists? of recent times.
When Peter Jennings, not long ago one of only three monolithic New York City newsmen charged with informing the public about the goings on around the globe, died recently, his colleague, Barbara Walters could think of no better way to eulogize him than to say ?what made Peter great was that he knew there was no such thing as the truth.?
This, of course, leaves one to wonder just what, exactly, Jennings was reporting every night. If, as his colleague of thirty years claims, he didn't believe truth existed, what was the criterion he employed in choosing the stories he would report and the way in which he would spin them?
The answer is that, since Jennings? job is to report the truth ? and, to him, the truth is that there is no such thing as the truth ? Jennings? sole job is to manipulate the evidence in his reports to undermine the beliefs of others by championing those things society recognizes as evil, wrong and failed and by tearing down that which the people recognize as good, right and successful.
This, of course, sees the Modern Liberal like Jennings (and Walters, apparently, since she thought not believing in the truth was the single quality that made her friend ?great?) manipulate the evidence ? Michael Moore it, if you will ? for no other purpose than to disabuse others of their belief in the truth.
Since the vast majority of Americans believe America to be good, then, it becomes the very job of people like Jennings to ?prove? that that belief isn't founded in truth by focusing only on the misdeeds, the short-comings and the set-backs America and Americans suffer. Similarly, since most Americans believe that the word of Jesus Christ is the truth, Jennings? job is nothing other than to cherry-pick, spin and manipulate the evidence ? to do whatever is necessary to do his job well ? to ?prove? that this belief is misguided.
Since ?there's no such thing as the truth,? then, Jennings (et al) are not rooted to fact and evidence, and lying does not bother them one bit. After all, in a world where there is no truth, what is a ?lie,? anyway?
Consider a speech given recently by leftist newsman Chris Matthews of the TV show ?Hardball,? to the children at the University of Toronto. Being a Modern Liberal Matthews began his talk by telling the children that the Islamic fascists ?aren't evil? (they simply have ?another way of looking at things.?)
But Matthews has a problem, assuming he has the slightest bit of human decency and recognizes that the cold-blooded mass murder of innocent people ? be they the thousands on 9/11 or the children in kindergartens in Russia and Israel ? is an evil act, how does he gibe his two positions? How does he explain people who ?aren't evil,? committing such heinous crimes in so many places around the globe?
The answer is that Matthews has to ? simply has to ? find, invent and distort any and all wrongs done to the murderers for, while cold-blooded mass murder is evil, ?justifiable homicide? isn't even a crime. In fact, justifiable homicide might even be considered an act of heroism in just the way so many on the left consider the terrorists to be heroes and ?freedom fighters.?
Yet it is not enough for Mathews to simply fabricate or exaggerate misdeeds America or Americans may have done, just as it is not enough to justify shooting someone simply because they broke into your home. If the burglar is stealing your stereo and running out the door and you shoot him, you have committed a crime. The only way for this not to be a crime is if the criminal is attacking you or your children, raping your wife, or strangling your mother.
Thus, in order to justify the violence of the Arab/Islamic world, the Modern Liberal like Matthews cannot simply point to minor misdeeds or wrongs America or Americans may have committed, but he needs to then exaggerate those wrongs to the point where they equal the evil visited upon the innocent.
Thus Ward Churchill, another powerful Modern Liberal, had no choice ? simply no choice ? but to call the innocent victims of 9/11 all ?little Eichmanns,? for, since the terrorists had created a miniature holocaust (lower case ?h? as in an all-encompassing and hellish fire), the only way the Modern Liberal could justify these murders and ?prove? the terrorists ?aren't evil,? is by calling the victims miniature Eichmanns.
When Chris Matthews, then, or Peter Jennings or Barbara Walters and the rest of the leftist news media portray America as the ultimate in evil it is specifically because we are the greatest of good. These evils need to be invented and exaggerated merely to justify the vicious and evil attacks which the Modern Liberal has already decided ? the day they entered kindergarten ? cannot be the work of evil people.
This is exactly the same dynamic behind the Modern Liberals hatred of Israel. The Democrats have no choice but to call Israel ?Nazis? not because they are but because the Arabs are. The Arabs/Moslems supported Hitler in World War II and after the war Nazis fled to Egypt and Syria and throughout the Arab world where they knew they'd be welcomed and feel at home.
The Nazis taught the Arabs/Moslems the ?tricks? they now use against the Jews of Israel ? not least of which is the messages taught to the ?youth,? and the Nazi-style propaganda techniques employed in the government controlled Arab press. In order to justify the Nazi tactics employed by the Arabs and the Moslems, then, the Modern Liberal has no choice but to not only invent ?wrongs? committed by the victims in Israel, but to elevate those wrongs to exactly the level of the evil that the Modern Liberal invariably and inevitably champions.
