travishunter3006
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,065
I thought I would put this together as food for thought.
If we need tag cuts I think non residents should be the first ones to take the cuts. They can hunt their own state an IF it sucks as bad as every one says it does, then why do they wan to hunt here anyways??
To generate the same amount of revenue he combo license would be raised to $37.22, a difference of $7.22
General Deer would be raised to $64.22, a differnce of $29.22
LE deer would be raised to $171.98, a differnce of $96.98
I don't like the thought of having to increase tag fees, etc... but if that means I get to hunt every year then I will pay it. really its not that much of an increase when you factor in just how much we all spend every year.
Non residents can have any left over tags as well, which would result in an overall increase in revenue for the state...
It was a big bodied 2 point. (this is my signature)
If we need tag cuts I think non residents should be the first ones to take the cuts. They can hunt their own state an IF it sucks as bad as every one says it does, then why do they wan to hunt here anyways??
To generate the same amount of revenue he combo license would be raised to $37.22, a difference of $7.22
General Deer would be raised to $64.22, a differnce of $29.22
LE deer would be raised to $171.98, a differnce of $96.98
I don't like the thought of having to increase tag fees, etc... but if that means I get to hunt every year then I will pay it. really its not that much of an increase when you factor in just how much we all spend every year.
Non residents can have any left over tags as well, which would result in an overall increase in revenue for the state...
It was a big bodied 2 point. (this is my signature)