Trammer
Active Member
- Messages
- 327
photos are photos and thats all they are and the photo in this case only shows that there is a big ram in a photo that presumably is in front of a mountain in the Yukon rather than BC where the ram was suppose to have been taken....SO WHAT....maybe the ram was killed in a brushy draw in BC strapped over a horse and photos taken on the way back to the truck (that may have been parked in the Yukon as the best place to stage the hunt from)The photo could have been taken exactly where the Crown claims it wa taken and it still doesnt mean the ram was shot there. The whole thing could be a big misunderstanding fabricated by Law Enforcement as a result of all the rumors that were started because of the photo.
IT could even be the witness or snitch in this case who was likely an accomplice if the ram was actually poached is getting a big fat paycheck in exchange for his testimony. Testimony that is more likely to untrue because of the legal witness tampering scheme the COs have made for themselves in the form of poaching rewards programs.
A presumption of innocence. Thats what Abe gets because it is proper the COs get a presumption of wrongdoing because thats what witness tampering is, even if its legal.
IT could even be the witness or snitch in this case who was likely an accomplice if the ram was actually poached is getting a big fat paycheck in exchange for his testimony. Testimony that is more likely to untrue because of the legal witness tampering scheme the COs have made for themselves in the form of poaching rewards programs.
A presumption of innocence. Thats what Abe gets because it is proper the COs get a presumption of wrongdoing because thats what witness tampering is, even if its legal.