treedagain
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 6,560
Here is the tags returned and were bought thru the new process
Will make it interesting this year as opposed to last where hunting pimp congolmerates could basically run click farms all day with their employees pulling tags for everyone in the office.....
Go look at the Sentence the guy in WY got for doing the same thing~ Think his last name was OldhamReally?!?
All I had to do to outsmart NDOW/Kalkomey was open up multiple browser sessions - each with my account logged in? Say, about 20 browser sessions spaced out every 2-3 seconds over the Kalkomey 35 second page refresh cycle? So, something like the attached two screen set-up?
And NDOW would let a NR do this and get a "Resident Agnostic" tag issued in violation of the supposed 10% NR cap? Turns out the NR cap only applies to the draw, not re-issued tags. Great loophole discovered by NDOW so they could resell those 102 bull tags and 7 ram tags for $1201 instead of $120.
Wow- the things I learn on MM...
I wonder how much Kalkomey was paid to develop such horrible software that any concert ticket scalper could have warned them about.
View attachment 70327
Go look at the Sentence the guy in WY got for doing the same thing- think his name was oldhamReally?!?
All I had to do to outsmart NDOW/Kalkomey was open up multiple browser sessions - each with my account logged in? Say, about 20 browser sessions spaced out every 2-3 seconds over the Kalkomey 35 second page refresh cycle? So, something like the attached two screen set-up?
And NDOW would let a NR do this and get a "Resident Agnostic" tag issued in violation of the supposed 10% NR cap? Turns out the NR cap only applies to the draw, not re-issued tags. Great loophole discovered by NDOW so they could resell those 102 bull tags and 7 ram tags for $1201 instead of $120.
Wow- the things I learn on MM...
I wonder how much Kalkomey was paid to develop such horrible software that any concert ticket scalper could have warned them about.
View attachment 70327
Great memory – the Byron Oldham case involved “an intellectual property crime of modifying data in a computer network”. He was able to hack the data on the WY GFD to get multiple moose apps inside their database for a single draw cycle. Altering data on someone else’s computer is a cybercrime in most states. This is not that…Go look at the Sentence the guy in WY got for doing the same thing- think his name was oldham