@MrShane
I have posted several times throughout these threads about all 3 weapon proposals, but it keeps getting drowned out.
The fact that the muzzleloader scope proposal continues to overshadow everything else says a lot about their purpose and value to being successful.
If data didn't show much of an Increase in success, why is the argument so strong to keep them?
I haven't had a single archer complain about losing his Garmin sight yet.
Archery Proposal-
No electronics on the bow
(no automatic ranging capabilities)
Muzzleloader Proposal-
1x scope w/reticle or red dot
Rifle Proposal-
No electronics on or inside the scope except for illuminated reticles. This is is still pending as we address the wording on the reticles as in needs to coincide with a 1x muzzleloader red dot.
(no automatic ranging capabilities)
None of these are drastic changes.
They are focused on the future of emerging technologies being developed resulting in more affordable and more widely used in the field.
If any of these proposals inhibit success as a hunter, golfing might be a better past time.